Re: [PATCH v2 19/25] sequencer: remember do_recursive_merge()'s return value
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 5, 2016, 17:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqmviipu7p.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610051348020.35196@virtualbox>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> Actually, come to think of it, I will change the patch, as it is too > confusing. What I want is to preserve a positive return value in case of > merge conflicts, and that is exactly what I should do instead of playing > games with the Boolean OR operator.
That would be good; that was exactly the confusion I felt that led to my comments.