Re: [PATCH v3 14/35] connect: request remote refs using v2
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 27, 2018, 06:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20180227062128.GG65699@aiede.svl.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20180222112533.0d7c6023fb8e4098efedfe31@google.com>
Jonathan Tan wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 13:26:58 -0500 > Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
>> I agree that it shouldn't matter much here. But if the name argv_array >> is standing in the way of using it, I think we should consider giving it >> a more general name. I picked that not to evoke "this must be arguments" >> but "this is terminated by a single NULL".
[...]
> This sounds reasonable - I withdraw my comment about using struct > string_list.
Marking with #leftoverbits as a reminder to think about what such a more general name would be (or what kind of docs to put in argv-array.h) and make it so the next time I do a search for that keyword.
Thanks, Jonathan