Re: [PATCH 01/18] Add a function to solve least-cost assignment problems
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- May 21, 2018, 09:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1805211152140.77@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
- In-Reply-To
- <CACsJy8ApDb_KTjoJgMuV_AJ+dQdGC0kgCnMcJXj5pMGdqMQCyA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Duy,
On Sun, 13 May 2018, Duy Nguyen wrote:
Show 21 quoted lines
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 5:30 PM, Johannes Schindelin
> <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> > + /* reduction transfer */
> > + free_row = xmalloc(sizeof(int) * row_count);
> > + for (int i = 0; i < row_count; i++) {
>
> travis complains about this
>
>
> hungarian.c: In function ‘compute_assignment’:
> hungarian.c:47:11: error: redeclaration of ‘i’ with no linkage
> for (int i = 0; i < row_count; i++) {
> ^
> hungarian.c:21:6: note: previous declaration of ‘i’ was here
> int i, j, phase;
> ^
> hungarian.c:47:2: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only
> allowed in C99 mode
> for (int i = 0; i < row_count; i++) {
> ^
> hungarian.c:47:2: note: use option -std=c99 or -std=gnu99 to compile your codeYep, I fixed it locally already before seeing your mail. It is good to know that some people pay attention, though!
Ciao, Dscho