Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] Reftable support for git-core
- From
Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com>
- Date
- Feb 3, 2020, 17:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAFQ2z_P4p+Vg7AFPusSqEYL3RdtcYh+47vgiXD4RV+LqnDVaVQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20200203170555.GB3525@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 6:05 PM Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> PS I don't know if it's set in stone yet, but if we're changing things > around, is it an option to put reftable-list inside the reftable > directory, just to keep the top-level uncluttered?
If we're moving things around, we can add this little difference too. The original idea was to create a conflict with the old-style storage, but putting the list in reftable/ actually makes files -> restable conversion slightly more atomic.
-- Han-Wen Nienhuys - Google Munich I work 80%. Don't expect answers from me on Fridays. --
Google Germany GmbH, Erika-Mann-Strasse 33, 80636 Munich
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado