From: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 17:09:56 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] Reftable support for git-core
Message-ID: <CAFQ2z_P4p+Vg7AFPusSqEYL3RdtcYh+47vgiXD4RV+LqnDVaVQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200203170555.GB3525@coredump.intra.peff.net>

On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 6:05 PM Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> PS I don't know if it's set in stone yet, but if we're changing things
>    around, is it an option to put reftable-list inside the reftable
>    directory, just to keep the top-level uncluttered?

If we're moving things around, we can add this little difference too.
The original idea was to create a conflict with the old-style storage,
but putting the list in reftable/ actually makes files -> restable
conversion slightly more atomic.

--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - Google Munich
I work 80%. Don't expect answers from me on Fridays.
--

Google Germany GmbH, Erika-Mann-Strasse 33, 80636 Munich

Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg

Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado