Re: [PATCH v12 03/12] refs: document how ref_iterator_advance_fn should handle symrefs
- From
Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com>
- Date
- May 11, 2020, 11:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAFQ2z_NQuSpCwqZM25KZL7AshZZD01Cn9tfWgEjT6A2N3bk3yA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqd07exnhs.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 8:58 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Makes sense. > > I wonder if I should take 1-3/12 as a separate "clean-up" series and > merge it before everything else down to 'master'? That would reduce > the churn somewhat.
That would be great. Do I need to send them separately, or do can you cherry-pick the changes out of this series?
> I also wonder if there are similar "clean-up" buried later in the > series. For example, would it make sense to also move 11/12 and have > it graduate early together with 1-3/12?
yes, I'll reorder my patches to reflect this.
-- Han-Wen Nienhuys - Google Munich I work 80%. Don't expect answers from me on Fridays. -- Google Germany GmbH, Erika-Mann-Strasse 33, 80636 Munich Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado