Re: [PATCH 5/5] add-patch: render hunks through the pager
- From
- Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
- Date
- May 20, 2024, 23:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <516ffe6bafb71f5645e93e6c01f721a7@manjaro.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <83071f70-e8a1-41d6-9fb1-108a31602baa@gmail.com>
On 2024-05-21 00:35, Rubén Justo wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 09:45:51PM +0200, Dragan Simic wrote: > >> Thus, if someone wants to have a complete longer-than-one-screen hunk >> displayed and use the terminal emulator scrollback to inspect the >> hunk in its entirety, passing such (or all) hunks through the pager >> would make such inspection impossible. I'd assume that at least some >> Git users already do that (I do, for example), and we surely don't >> want >> to make that no longer possible. > > I'm not sure if I understand the problem... disabling the pager is > still an option, no? > > $ git -P add -p > > $ git -c pager.add=false add -p
Please read the thread [1] that I linked in my previous response carefully. I know, there's _a lot_ of text, but I already tried to sum it all up in my previous response. There's even a video clip [2] in that thread that shows the issue with the corrupted scrollback in a terminal emulator.
Frankly, the "-c pager.add=false" approach is a bit cumbersome. Basically, the new "-P" option would be like "-c pager.add=true", while the already existing "-p" option would be like "-c pager.add=false". Though, I think that we don't want to add "pager.add" as a new configuration option, because throwing it into the mix would make the "-p" and "-P" options for "git add" quite confusing.
As another idea, we might also add "p" as another option in the "y/n/q/a/d..." menu when the user decides about each hunk in "git add -p" or "git add -P". When running "git add -p", pressing "p" would display the current hunk using the pager (which would be opposite to the "git add -p"'s behavior of not using the pager), and when running "git add -P", pressing "p" would display the current hunk by bypassing the pager (again, opposite to the "add -P"'s behavior). That would allow greatest level of flexibility.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/8289ef15266172cbfa10bb146afe9797@manjaro.org/T/#u [2] https://youtu.be/MsxtQgrKM50