Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] add-patch: render hunks through the pager

> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 10:09:25AM +0200, Dragan Simic wrote:
> 
>> > @@ -1387,7 +1388,7 @@ N_("j - leave this hunk undecided, see next
>> > undecided hunk\n"
>> >     "/ - search for a hunk matching the given regex\n"
>> >     "s - split the current hunk into smaller hunks\n"
>> >     "e - manually edit the current hunk\n"
>> > -   "p - print the current hunk\n"
>> > +   "p - print the current hunk, 'P' to use the pager\n"
>> 
>> I think it would be better to move the description of "P" into
>> a separate line after the "p" line, perhaps like this:
>> 
>>   "P - use the pager to print the current hunk\n"
>> 
>> I know, we'd sacrifice one line of the valuable vertical space
>> this way, but I find it more consistent and much harder to miss
>> the new "P" option.
> 
> Making 'P' a /version/ of 'p' allows us to skip adding 'P' to the list
> of available options:
> 
>     (1/1) Stage this hunk [y,n,q,a,d,j,J,k,K,g,/,s,e,p,P,?]
> 
> This is what I though and this long list is what worries me.