Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] cat-file: add remote-object-info to batch-command
- From
Peijian Ju <eric.peijian@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 19, 2024, 16:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAN2LT1Dm17-mmoMQr457fb5ta-TxG6Fj3Ma-gPh4YRJV9rRDrw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqy11fd8i3.fsf@gitster.g>
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 1:48 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> > Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes: > > > While having a quarantine directory would help with the case where you > > have differing end user behaviour depending on the protocol, it of > > course wouldn't help with the implied performance hit when using the > > fallback logic. > > > > So maybe not having the fallback is the best solution after all, and > > when users have a good use case for why they need it we could implement > > it in a future iteration. > > And I would strongly suspect that we won't have to implement any > fallback---hopefully folks upgrade their server side to be capable > of whatever capability is needed fast enough ;-). > > Thanks.
Thank you, sir, and also Patrick and Christian, for helping clarify this for me. That makes sense. I will remove the "fetch and inspect" approach in the next series.