Re: VCS comparison table
- From
- Erik Bågfors <zindar@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 22, 2006, 00:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <845b6e870610211709p13821dfdv1abab7225b0ab3a9@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610211353070.3962@g5.osdl.org>
On 10/21/06, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> > > On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Erik Bågfors wrote: > > > > bzr is a fully decentralized VCS. I've read this thread for quite some > > time now and I really cannot understand why people come to this > > conclusion. > > Even the bzr people agree, so what's not to understand?
The use of the word "decentralized".
When I think centralized, I think "all users must commit to a central repo/branch". In this sense bzr is 100% fully decentralized. You are free to commit to a none-central branch.
What I mean is that it's fully decentralized, but it may have a bias to the usage of a central branch/repo.
/Erik
-- google talk/jabber. zindar@gmail.com SIP-phones: sip:erik_bagfors@gizmoproject.com sip:17476714687@proxy01.sipphone.com