Re: VCS comparison table
- From
Sean <seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
- Date
- Oct 22, 2006, 14:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <BAYC1-PASMTP081ED05E35BA4CFC6154A9AE030@CEZ.ICE>
- In-Reply-To
- <20061022135702.GU75501@over-yonder.net>
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 08:57:02 -0500 "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> You keep insisting that there's a PROBLEM here. You're right, I don't > see one. I KNOW the numbers only refer to a branch, I KNOW that when > you're talking about a different branch the numbers are meaningless, > and I'm perfectly fine with that because referring to revisions on *A* > branch is exactly what I USE the numbers for.
Light goes on. Okay. So a bzr "branch" is only ever editable on a single machine. So there is no distributed development on top of a bzr "branch". Everyone else just has read-only copies of it. In this way you ensure that there is never a conflict of the revno's. I'm not sure of the ramifications of this but at least I get where you're coming from now.
Sean