From: Erik Bågfors Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 00:09:51 GMT Subject: Re: VCS comparison table Message-ID: <845b6e870610211709p13821dfdv1abab7225b0ab3a9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: On 10/21/06, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Erik Bågfors wrote: > > > > bzr is a fully decentralized VCS. I've read this thread for quite some > > time now and I really cannot understand why people come to this > > conclusion. > > Even the bzr people agree, so what's not to understand? The use of the word "decentralized". When I think centralized, I think "all users must commit to a central repo/branch". In this sense bzr is 100% fully decentralized. You are free to commit to a none-central branch. What I mean is that it's fully decentralized, but it may have a bias to the usage of a central branch/repo. /Erik -- google talk/jabber. zindar@gmail.com SIP-phones: sip:erik_bagfors@gizmoproject.com sip:17476714687@proxy01.sipphone.com