Re: git and bzr
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 30, 2006, 00:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <ekl8j5$in4$1@sea.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <87bqmpvlxf.wl%cworth@cworth.org>
Carl Worth wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> In the thread on the fedora > mailing list that prompted my first "user-interface warts" and the > patch I mentioned above, the process was worse: > > git commit > "hmm... why didn't that work" > read message > git update-index > git commit > "crap... it still didn't work even when I did what it told me to do" > > Here's the original version of that report: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-November/msg00141.html
From the SYNOPSIS of git-update-index(1) one can see that git-update-index needs files to act on.
But I agree that git is not very user friendly, and has some usability warts.
-- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git