Re: VCS comparison table
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
- Date
- Oct 24, 2006, 19:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20061024192707.GG20017@pasky.or.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <ehllqj$bee$1@sea.gmane.org>
Dear diary, on Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 08:25:53PM CEST, I got a letter where Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> said that...
Show 15 quoted lines
> David Lang wrote: > > > 1. Centralized: all commits must go to one repository, connectivity > > required to check-in > > Bazaar-NG "light checkouts" implements this. Git doesn't support this > topology, and probably wouldn't. > > 1.5. Disconnected centralized. Like centralized, but you can work (perhaps > limited to what you can do) even without connection to central server. > Minimally you have to be able to commit changes locally, if central server > is not available. Bzr "normal/heavyweight checkouts" are [roughly] abot > this. Git "lazy clone" proposal is about similar thing; you can get git to > support this model (although without space savings) with full > clone + hooks.
Cogito can do it now out of the box, having support for cg-commit --push and cg-update preserving uncommitted local changes.
Not that you probably should use it. ;-)
--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1