Re: VCS comparison table
- From
- Erik Bågfors <zindar@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 21, 2006, 17:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <845b6e870610211033h4b9d2667u6498fc7461473997@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <BAYC1-PASMTP04FAD1FBB91BA4C07A5E79AE020@CEZ.ICE>
On 10/21/06, Sean <seanlkml@sympatico.ca> wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 18:35:18 +0200 > "Erik Bågfors" <zindar@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > So... I do agree that revnos might not fit perfectly in at all times. > > But that they automatically mean that bzr is not a decentralized VCS, > > I strongly disagree with. They are just one part of the equation. > > Whoe are you strongly disagreeing with? Nobody said it wasn't a > decentralized VCS. But there is a _clear_ bias towards using it > with a central server.
Ok, I take that back :)
When I think "centralized" I think "everyone must commit to a central repository"... which is not what we are talking about here...
/Erik ps. Sean, your mailer does something wierd with my last name in the to-field, so I can't just hit "reply" without removing my name first...
/Erik
-- google talk/jabber. zindar@gmail.com SIP-phones: sip:erik_bagfors@gizmoproject.com sip:17476714687@proxy01.sipphone.com