Re: VCS comparison table
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 25, 2006, 22:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <ehooeo$1g6$2@sea.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20061025221531.GB10140@spearce.org>
Shawn Pearce wrote:
Show 18 quoted lines
> David Lang <dlang@digitalinsight.com> wrote:
>> a quick lesson on program nameing
>>
>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
>>
>> >I'm personally all for a rewrite of the necessary commands in C ("commit"
>> >comes to mind), but as many others, I have no personal interest in doing
>> >the actual work. I'm fairly certain that once we get it working natively
>> >on windows with some decent performance, windows hackers will pick up the
>> >ball and write "wingit", which will be a log viewer and GUI thing for
>> ^^^^^^
>>
>> how many other people read this as 'wing it' rather then 'win git'? ;-)
>
> Yes, that's certainly a less than optimal name...
>
> What about gitk? Is it "gi tk" or "git k" ? This has actually
> been the source of much local debate. :-)You can always use CamelCase, i.e. WinGit or WinGIT (or wgit, but this is also silly).
Cute names are taken: CoGITo, gitk, qgit (GTK+ history viewer is gitview, not ggit, curiously ;-) and tig.
-- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git