Re: git blame
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Show 25 quoted lines
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Carl Worth wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here's a crazy idea. How about a "git tutorial" builtin or "git example"
>>>> or something that would create a repository into some useful state for
>>>> demonstrating something.
>>>
>>> That sounds fine! Actually, it should be very simple to turn the tutorial
>>> into such a script, displaying the command with an explanation, and
>>> executing the command. It could even call gitk from time to time, so the
>>> user can form a mental model of the ancestor graph.
>>
>> Doesn't one of our existing t/ scripts do that?
>
> ;-) I did not forget... t1200-tutorial.sh
>
> But it serves a different purpose: it makes sure that we did not break the
> commands in the tutorial. (I fear that the script and the tutorial have
> diverged a little bit, though).
>
> git-tutorial should not test that, rather it should show the user what is
> possible, and encourage playing with git.
Something like Cogito tutorial-script?
--
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>