Re: VCS comparison table
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 21, 2006, 20:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200610212255.49791.jnareb@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <87ac3p1jn7.wl%cworth@cworth.org>
Carl Worth wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Also, since the git names are so predictable, git almost never emits > them. It accepts them as names just fine, but it doesn't generate > them, (log, and commit never show the branch-specific names). I think > the only git command that even can emit such a name was a recently > added git-name-rev which exists solely for the purpose of mapping a > commit identifier to a local, branch-specific name which might have > more intuitive meaning for the user.
git-show-branch also shows git-name-rev like names.
BTW. git-show-branch has somewhat strange, and different from other git commands UI. You can think of it as text version of gitk/qgit history viewer (although you can use tig for CLI (ncurses) graph).
-- Jakub Narebski Poland