From: Erik Bågfors Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 17:33:08 GMT Subject: Re: VCS comparison table Message-ID: <845b6e870610211033h4b9d2667u6498fc7461473997@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: On 10/21/06, Sean wrote: > On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 18:35:18 +0200 > "Erik Bågfors" wrote: > > > > So... I do agree that revnos might not fit perfectly in at all times. > > But that they automatically mean that bzr is not a decentralized VCS, > > I strongly disagree with. They are just one part of the equation. > > Whoe are you strongly disagreeing with? Nobody said it wasn't a > decentralized VCS. But there is a _clear_ bias towards using it > with a central server. Ok, I take that back :) When I think "centralized" I think "everyone must commit to a central repository"... which is not what we are talking about here... /Erik ps. Sean, your mailer does something wierd with my last name in the to-field, so I can't just hit "reply" without removing my name first... /Erik -- google talk/jabber. zindar@gmail.com SIP-phones: sip:erik_bagfors@gizmoproject.com sip:17476714687@proxy01.sipphone.com