From: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 19:27:07 GMT
Subject: Re: VCS comparison table
Message-ID: <20061024192707.GG20017@pasky.or.cz>
In-Reply-To: <ehllqj$bee$1@sea.gmane.org>

Dear diary, on Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 08:25:53PM CEST, I got a letter
where Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> said that...
> David Lang wrote:
> 
> > 1. Centralized: all commits must go to one repository, connectivity
> > required to check-in 
> 
> Bazaar-NG "light checkouts" implements this. Git doesn't support this
> topology, and probably wouldn't.
> 
> 1.5. Disconnected centralized. Like centralized, but you can work (perhaps
> limited to what you can do) even without connection to central server.
> Minimally you have to be able to commit changes locally, if central server
> is not available. Bzr "normal/heavyweight checkouts" are [roughly] abot
> this. Git "lazy clone" proposal is about similar thing; you can get git to
> support this model (although without space savings) with full 
> clone + hooks.

Cogito can do it now out of the box, having support for cg-commit --push
and cg-update preserving uncommitted local changes.

Not that you probably should use it. ;-)

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1