Re: [PATCH 0/4] hash.h: support choosing a separate SHA-1 for non-cryptographic uses
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Sep 5, 2024, 16:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq34me3uyz.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <ZtnbFXL7W5DvW8UN@nand.local>
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:
> If so, I agree, but would note that this series does not yet switch > index-pack to use the non-collision detecting SHA-1 implementation when > available, so that would not be a prerequisite for merging this series.
Hmph, I am confused. It needs to be corrected in order to address collisions of the tail sum Peff raised, as no longer checked the tail sum with SHA1DC but with "fast" SHA-1.
Doesn't it make it a prerequisite?