Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] hash.h: support choosing a separate SHA-1 for non-cryptographic uses
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Sep 6, 2024, 21:50 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqcylgv4cf.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <cover.1725651952.git.me@ttaylorr.com>
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:
> Peff and I wrote the first four (new) patches together, and I feel > confident now that we're in a good spot to address the concerns raised > in [1].
I just read the first four and they made sense.
With "fast" -> "insecure", the latter half of the series would also cover the review comments on earlier rounds, I would imagine?
Thanks.