Re: [PATCH 2/4] hash.h: scaffolding for _fast hashing variants
- From
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
- Date
- Sep 3, 2024, 21:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Ztd+lgWcRQs2IfvJ@nand.local>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqy148h3ci.fsf@gitster.g>
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 01:47:09PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> > So I do not think that either of these two steps are necessary. > > I suspect that it is a wrong conclusion, as I meant (1) to be > prerequisite for doing (2) and (3), that gives us the real benefit > of being able to go faster than SHA1DC or even SHA-256. If (1) is > unnecessary (because it is already covered), that is great---we can > directly jump to (2) and (3).
Ah, yes, after re-reading your message I am definitely mistaken here. I think that in the future doing this would be more than worthwhile.
Thanks, Taylor