Re: [PATCH 0/4] hash.h: support choosing a separate SHA-1 for non-cryptographic uses
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Sep 3, 2024, 20:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq34mgii0z.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <ZtdoD/slbc+u7Aql@nand.local>
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:
> Yeah. I would actually like to get here in the long-term, but of course > that change is much larger than this one (the protocol would have to be > adjusted to learn a new "tailsum" capability for callers to negotiate > which checksumming hash function they want to use, etc.).
I dunno. I was talking about strictly local tail sum, like the ones in the index file. You do not have anybody to negotiate about anything.
We already agreed that the name of a packfile is a different matter.