Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics)
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jul 19, 2008, 23:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0807200113440.3305@eeepc-johanness>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v4p6l3jbm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Hi,
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes: > > > Yes, I agree, if all strategies fail, it is dubitable that we find a > > metric that will always find the "best" one. But if one fails and the > > next one does not, it is obvious what is correct. > > Not at all. Imagine the case where one of them is either ours or > theirs.
But then it is not the _default_ at all!
It is what the _user_ _asked_ for.
So this is what the user gets.
With Git, the user is not ignored (like GNOME does, to "help" the user). With Git, the user _gets_ what she asked for, even if the question does not make sense.
Ciao, Dscho