Re: [PATCH] Ask for "git program" even against git-daemon

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org> writes:
>> >
>> > But I wonder if this patch is even worth it at some later point
>> > in time.  Are we also going to change git-daemon to stop accepting
>> > "git-" form?  Is it a worthwhile change?
>> 
>> This was merely responding to...
>> 
>>     From: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
>>     Subject: Re: [PATCH] Keep some git-* programs in $(bindir)
>>     Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:37:41 -0400
>>     Message-ID: <20080625043741.GD11793@spearce.org>
>> 
>>     Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> wrote:
>>     > ...
>>     > Should they use "git upload-pack" [...]
>> 
>>     IMHO they should in the future use "git upload-pack".
>
> Sorry I wasn't clear. I was talking about the SSH transport only.
> For git:// we could just always send git-upload-pack, like your
> transitional patch does.  Then we stay compatible with even very
> old git:// servers.