Re: PPC SHA-1 Updates in "pu"

From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Date: Jun 25, 2006, 23:23 UTC
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0606260121040.29667@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
In-Reply-To: <86veqp8456.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com>

Hi,

On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:

Show 8 quoted lines

> >>>>> "Johannes" == Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> Johannes> Perl, Python and sometimes even bash are good for fast
> Johannes> prototyping. But for serious work, such as profiling, they are not
> Johannes> that good.
> 
> Allow my to register my strong disagreement to that statement, but then I'll
> crawl back in my hole.

Which statement do you mean? The "good for fast prototyping" one? ;-)

Being our friendly local Perl wizard, who could code cvsserver as a Perl one-liner, you probably want to say that profiling Perl is easy. Can you enlighten me how to do memory _and_ timing profiling on, say, a per-line basis?

Ciao, Dscho