Re: [POOL] Who likes running Git without make install?
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Jul 2, 2006, 00:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vlkrcdg6d.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060701235906.GE29115@pasky.or.cz>
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> writes:
Show 18 quoted lines
> Dear diary, on Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 08:48:31AM CEST, I got a letter > where Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> said that... >> I remember myself getting utterly discusted when I saw the >> inclusion of the build-time blib directory in the search path in >> some other Perl code outside git. > > Well, yes, it is ugly, but it was really cool that we could have used > Git without installing it anywhere. > > But perhaps that's just me refusing to break his old ways of doing > things. Does anyone else care about it? (And why?) > >> Worse yet, I suspect the order you do the two directories is >> wrong to prefer the freshly built one over the one you installed >> the last time, but I was trying not to stare at too much for >> health reasons so ... ;-). > > Oh man, of course you are right. :-)
That's fixed in ancient past in git timescale. Why are you bringing it up again? ;-)