Re: [POOL] Who likes running Git without make install?

From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Jul 2, 2006, 17:19 UTC
Message-ID: <7virmf6i1q.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20060702113057.GF29115@pasky.or.cz>

Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> writes:

Show 6 quoted lines

> Dear diary, on Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 02:05:46AM CEST, I got a letter
> where Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> said that...
>> That's fixed in ancient past in git timescale.  Why are you
>> bringing it up again? ;-)
>
> Because, it is, well, not fixed? ;-) (Apparently.)

That response is about "Worse yet, the order is wrong -- ah you are right" exchange, not about in-place execution.

Show 15 quoted lines

>> Well, for a quick test to see if I haven't broken anything, I
>> use a new shell and do ". ./+denv" in my git repository where
>> that file has something like this:
>> 
>>         $ cat ./+denv
>>         :
>> 
>>         GIT_EXEC_PATH=`pwd`
>>         PATH=`pwd`:/usr/bin:/bin
>> 
>>         export GIT_EXEC_PATH PATH
>> 
>> So to a certain degree, yes I do care.
>
> But it is currently broken:

I know.  The scriptlet needs to muck with PERL5LIB too.