Re: [POLL] Who likes running Git without make install?

From: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Date: Jul 3, 2006, 08:17 UTC
Message-ID: <20060703081725.GM29115@pasky.or.cz>
In-Reply-To: <7vmzbrrtz4.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

Dear diary, on Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 10:08:31AM CEST, I got a letter where Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> said that...

Show 17 quoted lines

> Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> writes:
> 
> > Dear diary, on Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 08:54:47AM CEST, I got a letter
> > where Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> said that...
> >> -- >8 --
> >> INSTALL: a tip for running after building but without installing.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
> >
> > Acked-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
> >
> > I can live with this "weak (D3)". 99% of Git users probably use
> > installed Git instance anyway and most of the rest are likely to be Git
> > developers testing new code who can do this extra environment setup.
> 
> You earlier had to set two environment variables anyway but you
> have added another.  I do not see what's weak about it.

I don't usually use the git wrapper so I got away without setting GIT_EXEC_PATH yet. ;-)

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
Snow falling on Perl. White noise covering line noise.
Hides all the bugs too. -- J. Putnam