Re: [PATCH v3 03/16] reftable: add LICENSE
- From
Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com>
- Date
- Dec 1, 2020, 09:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAFQ2z_PaPdiJC71WGdePFVgxyJFFHZY_DFbmLg9sRFm=vc7XYw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s0zoekLZYQ=r516jjdsGGQ2Y7m1fXpwW2BBJsGjQ5sseA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:21 PM Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 2:28 PM Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 12:26 PM Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com> wrote: > > > Until the reftable code is actually merged into git, I work on the > > > reftable library itself at github.com/google/reftable. I've asked our > > > opensource team if we could switch off the CLA enforcement for this > > > repo, to facilitate back & forth imports of fixes. > > > > I've asked our lawyers, but this is not currently possible, unfortunately. > > Maybe I'm not understanding something correctly.
> Sounds to me Google has not made its mind about actually contributing > these changes. > > Or am I missing something?
The restrictions are not about the patches themselves. They are about restricting what gets posted under github.com/google/ .
-- Han-Wen Nienhuys - Google Munich I work 80%. Don't expect answers from me on Fridays. -- Google Germany GmbH, Erika-Mann-Strasse 33, 80636 Munich Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado