Re: [PATCH] ci: fix missing Ruby dependency in "documentation" job
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> But these days I'd guess everybody is using v2.0.x (which seems to work
> fine) for local builds. We probably ought to do the same in CI. If we
> have to catch issues in one, I'd rather it be the one people are likely
> to actually use.
>
> It's possible that we could benefit from building with both in order to
> support the older version. But given its age I doubt it's worth it. We
> can still take bug fixes if somebody finds a problem, but we don't
> necessarily need to spend cycles building every commit with 1.5.8.
Yup, thanks for a dose of sanity.
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>