From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 17:58:32 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] ci: fix missing Ruby dependency in "documentation" job Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20260901084737.GA2973751@coredump.intra.peff.net> Jeff King writes: > But these days I'd guess everybody is using v2.0.x (which seems to work > fine) for local builds. We probably ought to do the same in CI. If we > have to catch issues in one, I'd rather it be the one people are likely > to actually use. > > It's possible that we could benefit from building with both in order to > support the older version. But given its age I doubt it's worth it. We > can still take bug fixes if somebody finds a problem, but we don't > necessarily need to spend cycles building every commit with 1.5.8. Yup, thanks for a dose of sanity.