Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] ce_compare_data() did not respect conversion
- From
Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
- Date
- May 1, 2016, 16:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <a571e222-68db-3dc1-1a94-d6b47feaf84d@web.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqvb30w29z.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On 29.04.16 23:09, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Well, didn't I do exactly the above much earlier and discarded it > because that breaks the definition of "diff"? Or is this doing > something differently?
Yes, and I try to sneak it in anyway ;-)
I spend some time debugging how to get t6038 passed, and need some more time.
If 10/10 is a no-go (and it probably should be), does it make sense to keep 1/10..4/10 and discard 5..10 for the moment ?