Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] ce_compare_data() did not respect conversion
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 3, 2016, 18:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqbn4nngci.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <55d60bb1-8626-4c97-630c-1a9f114c46b4@web.de>
Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de> writes:
> This will probably take some time, so that's why I asked if 1/10..4/10 could > proceed as is ?
Sure, I wasn't saying 1-4 looked wrong at all. I was wondering why the ones in the middle, especially 7, shouldn't be moved forward together with them.