Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] ce_compare_data() did not respect conversion
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 2, 2016, 18:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqtwigtjfg.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <a571e222-68db-3dc1-1a94-d6b47feaf84d@web.de>
Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de> writes:
Show 13 quoted lines
> On 29.04.16 23:09, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Well, didn't I do exactly the above much earlier and discarded it >> because that breaks the definition of "diff"? Or is this doing >> something differently? > > Yes, and I try to sneak it in anyway ;-) > > I spend some time debugging how to get t6038 passed, and need > some more time. > > If 10/10 is a no-go (and it probably should be), > does it make sense to keep 1/10..4/10 and discard 5..10 for the moment ?
Earlier patches in the series certainly felt alright. I do not remember noticing where it went in a strange direction to be honest.