From: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 16:27:05 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] ce_compare_data() did not respect conversion
Message-ID: <a571e222-68db-3dc1-1a94-d6b47feaf84d@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqvb30w29z.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

On 29.04.16 23:09, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Well, didn't I do exactly the above much earlier and discarded it
> because that breaks the definition of "diff"?  Or is this doing
> something differently?

Yes, and I try to sneak it in anyway ;-)

I spend some time debugging how to get t6038 passed, and need
some more time.

If 10/10 is a no-go (and it probably should be),
does it make sense to keep 1/10..4/10 and discard 5..10 for the moment ?