Re: [PATCH v4 00/36] Run hooks via "git run hook" & hook library
- From
Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
- Date
- Aug 19, 2021, 23:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <YR7r3h1AG4Zyn7x7@google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <cover-v4-00.36-00000000000-20210803T191505Z-avarab@gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 09:38:26PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> > This is a v4 re-roll of the "Base for "config-based-hooks" topic. > * Almost all the callers were just "one-shot" callers, I introduced a > new run_hooks_oneshot() function for those, which gets rid of the > verbosity around memory management, see e.g. the "builtin/gc.c" in > the range-diff below. That run_hooks_oneshot() can also take a NULL > set of options.
I discussed this elswhere, but just to make doubly sure that comment doesn't get lost, here's a link to my mail: https://lore.kernel.org/git/YR2jLdYQA5CVzX5h%40google.com
Show 8 quoted lines
> Range-diff against v3:
> 1: 27c94247f87 = 1: 81fe1ed90d5 Makefile: mark "check" target as .PHONY
> 2: 6e164edb0b0 ! 2: 0f749530777 Makefile: stop hardcoding {command,config}-list.h
> 3: ddae86802e2 ! 3: 644b31fe281 Makefile: remove an out-of-date comment
> 4: 58c37e4f06e = 4: 89c4d44b0c3 hook.[ch]: move find_hook() to this new library
> 5: 0cf7e078ef4 = 5: 3514e0c0251 hook.c: add a hook_exists() wrapper and use it in bugreport.c
> -: ----------- > 6: d5ef40f77dc hook.c users: use "hook_exists()" insted of "find_hook()"
> 6: f343fc7ae66 ! 7: 4cfd72722c1 hook-list.h: add a generated list of hooks, like config-list.hSince these 6 were broken out and then brought back into this series, I'll review them individually downthread.
Show 8 quoted lines
> 7: cf4b06bfdf8 ! 8: 7cb4a4cb69e hook: add 'run' subcommand
> @@ builtin/hook.c (new)
> +#include "strbuf.h"
> +#include "strvec.h"
> +
> ++#define BUILTIN_HOOK_RUN_USAGE \
> ++ N_("git hook run <hook-name> [-- <hook-args>]")
> ++Nice, now we avoid string duplication here...
> +static const char * const builtin_hook_usage[] = {
> -+ N_("git hook <command> [...]"),...and there is no point including this vague thing that has a more specific description right after. Ok.
> -+ N_("git hook run <hook-name> [-- <hook-args>]"),
> ++ BUILTIN_HOOK_RUN_USAGE,
> + NULL
> +};[...]
Show 27 quoted lines
> @@ builtin/hook.c (new)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct run_hooks_opt opt = RUN_HOOKS_OPT_INIT;
> -+ int rc = 0;
> + const char *hook_name;
> + const char *hook_path;
> -+
> + struct option run_options[] = {
> + OPT_END(),
> + };
> ++ int ret;
> +
> + argc = parse_options(argc, argv, prefix, run_options,
> + builtin_hook_run_usage,
> -+ PARSE_OPT_KEEP_UNKNOWN | PARSE_OPT_KEEP_DASHDASH);
> -+
> -+ if (argc > 1) {
> -+ if (strcmp(argv[1], "--") &&
> -+ strcmp(argv[1], "--end-of-options"))
> -+ /* Having a -- for "run" is mandatory */
> -+ usage_with_options(builtin_hook_usage, run_options);
> -+ /* Add our arguments, start after -- */
> -+ for (i = 2 ; i < argc; i++)
> -+ strvec_push(&opt.args, argv[i]);
> -+ }
> ++ PARSE_OPT_KEEP_DASHDASH);Nice - this code is being broken up and moved later.
Show 10 quoted lines
> + > -+ /* Need to take into account core.hooksPath */ > -+ git_config(git_default_config, NULL); > ++ if (!argc) > ++ goto usage; > + > + /* > -+ * We are not using run_hooks() because we'd like to detect > -+ * missing hooks. Let's find it ourselves and call > -+ * run_found_hooks() instead.
This comment disappears entirely. I am not too terribly upset about it, since this behavior changes in my series anyway, but it seems like it might have been an accident?
Show 51 quoted lines
> ++ * Having a -- for "run" when providing <hook-args> is
> ++ * mandatory.
> + */
> ++ if (argc > 1 && strcmp(argv[1], "--") &&
> ++ strcmp(argv[1], "--end-of-options"))
> ++ goto usage;
> ++
> ++ /* Add our arguments, start after -- */
> ++ for (i = 2 ; i < argc; i++)
> ++ strvec_push(&opt.args, argv[i]);
> ++
> ++ /* Need to take into account core.hooksPath */
> ++ git_config(git_default_config, NULL);
> ++
> + hook_name = argv[0];
> + hook_path = find_hook(hook_name);
> + if (!hook_path) {
> + error("cannot find a hook named %s", hook_name);
> + return 1;
> + }
> -+ rc = run_found_hooks(hook_name, hook_path, &opt);
> +
> ++ ret = run_hooks(hook_name, hook_path, &opt);
> + run_hooks_opt_clear(&opt);
> -+
> -+ return rc;
> ++ return ret;
> ++usage:
> ++ usage_with_options(builtin_hook_run_usage, run_options);
> +}
> +
> +int cmd_hook(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> @@ builtin/hook.c (new)
> + struct option builtin_hook_options[] = {
> + OPT_END(),
> + };
> ++
> + argc = parse_options(argc, argv, NULL, builtin_hook_options,
> + builtin_hook_usage, PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION);
> + if (!argc)
> -+ usage_with_options(builtin_hook_usage, builtin_hook_options);
> ++ goto usage;
> +
> + if (!strcmp(argv[0], "run"))
> + return run(argc, argv, prefix);
> -+ else
> -+ usage_with_options(builtin_hook_usage, builtin_hook_options);
> ++
> ++usage:
> ++ usage_with_options(builtin_hook_usage, builtin_hook_options);
> +}The goto pattern seems readable enough elsewhere, though.
Show 8 quoted lines
> ## command-list.txt ## > @@ hook.c: int hook_exists(const char *name) > + struct hook_cb_data *hook_cb = pp_cb; > + struct hook *run_me = hook_cb->run_me; > + > ++ if (!run_me) > ++ return 0; > ++
Now we protect ourselves from the repeated calls to pick_next_hook(). Good.
Show 14 quoted lines
> + cp->no_stdin = 1; > + cp->env = hook_cb->options->env.v; > + cp->stdout_to_stderr = 1; > @@ hook.c: int hook_exists(const char *name) > + /* Provide context for errors if necessary */ > + *pp_task_cb = run_me; > + > ++ /* > ++ * This pick_next_hook() will be called again, we're only > ++ * running one hook, so indicate that no more work will be > ++ * done. > ++ */ > ++ hook_cb->run_me = NULL; > ++
And clearly explaining the caller's behavior here. Sure.
Show 9 quoted lines
> + return 1; > +} > + > @@ hook.c: int hook_exists(const char *name) > + > + hook_cb->rc |= result; > + > -+ return 1; > ++ return 0;
And finally, report "everything is fine" on task finished. Thanks.
Show 6 quoted lines
> +} > + > -+int run_found_hooks(const char *hook_name, const char *hook_path, > -+ struct run_hooks_opt *options) > ++int run_hooks(const char *hook_name, const char *hook_path, > ++ struct run_hooks_opt *options)
Ok. With the rename, we only have "verbose way to call it" and "speedy way to call it". No more "run_found_hooks()". Thanks, I think I like this better - I found "run_found_hooks()" to be a little ambiguous.
Show 24 quoted lines
> @@ hook.c: int hook_exists(const char *name)
> + hook_name);
> +
> + return cb_data.rc;
> -+}
> -+
> -+int run_hooks(const char *hook_name, struct run_hooks_opt *options)
> -+{
> -+ const char *hook_path;
> -+ int ret;
> -+ if (!options)
> -+ BUG("a struct run_hooks_opt must be provided to run_hooks");
> -+
> -+ hook_path = find_hook(hook_name);
> -+
> -+ /*
> -+ * If you need to act on a missing hook, use run_found_hooks()
> -+ * instead
> -+ */
> -+ if (!hook_path)
> -+ return 0;
> -+
> -+ ret = run_found_hooks(hook_name, hook_path, options);
> -+ return ret;Ok - so we wait for another patch to introduce run_hooks_oneshot. Fine.
Show 15 quoted lines
> +} > > ## hook.h ## > @@ hook.h: const char *find_hook(const char *name); > + > + /* Args to be passed to each hook */ > + struct strvec args; > -+ > -+ /* > -+ * Number of threads to parallelize across, currently a stub, > -+ * we use the parallel API for future-proofing, but we always > -+ * have one hook of a given name, so this is always an > -+ * implicit 1 for now. > -+ */ > -+ int jobs;
Thanks. I think this makes more sense than the weird "futureproofing" state it was in before.
Show 12 quoted lines
> ## t/t1800-hook.sh (new) ## > @@ t/t1800-hook.sh (new) > + > +test_expect_success 'git hook usage' ' > + test_expect_code 129 git hook && > -+ test_expect_code 129 git hook -h && > -+ test_expect_code 129 git hook run -h > ++ test_expect_code 129 git hook run && > ++ test_expect_code 129 git hook run -h && > ++ test_expect_code 129 git hook run --unknown 2>err && > ++ grep "unknown option" err > +'
Nice. I was able to use this test myself when I added 'git hook list', too.
The changes to this patch look good to me.
Show 15 quoted lines
> 8: 7209f73f281 ! 9: 2b8500aa675 gc: use hook library for pre-auto-gc hook > @@ Metadata > ## Commit message ## > gc: use hook library for pre-auto-gc hook > > - Using the hook.h library instead of the run-command.h library to run > - pre-auto-gc means that those hooks can be set up in config files, as > - well as in the hookdir. pre-auto-gc is called only from builtin/gc.c. > + Move the pre-auto-gc hook away from run-command.h to and over to the > + new hook.h library. > + > + To do this introduce a simple run_hooks_oneshot() wrapper, we'll be > + using it extensively for these simple cases of wanting to run a single > + hook under a given name, and having it free the memory we allocate for > + us.
Cool, so we have an excuse for introducing the oneshot wrapper right away. Thanks.
Show 22 quoted lines
> -@@ builtin/gc.c: static void add_repack_incremental_option(void)
> -
> - static int need_to_gc(void)
> - {
> -+ struct run_hooks_opt hook_opt = RUN_HOOKS_OPT_INIT;
> -+
> - /*
> - * Setting gc.auto to 0 or negative can disable the
> - * automatic gc.
> @@ builtin/gc.c: static int need_to_gc(void)
> else
> return 0;
>
> - if (run_hook_le(NULL, "pre-auto-gc", NULL))
> -+ if (run_hooks("pre-auto-gc", &hook_opt)) {
> -+ run_hooks_opt_clear(&hook_opt);
> ++ if (run_hooks_oneshot("pre-auto-gc", NULL))
> return 0;
> -+ }
> -+ run_hooks_opt_clear(&hook_opt);
> return 1;
> }Nice - the callsite looks much tidier now.
Show 15 quoted lines
> +
> + ## hook.c ##
> +@@ hook.c: int run_hooks(const char *hook_name, const char *hook_path,
>
> + return cb_data.rc;
> + }
> ++
> ++int run_hooks_oneshot(const char *hook_name, struct run_hooks_opt *options)
> ++{
> ++ const char *hook_path;
> ++ int ret;
> ++ struct run_hooks_opt hook_opt_scratch = RUN_HOOKS_OPT_INIT;
> ++
> ++ if (!options)
> ++ options = &hook_opt_scratch;Ah, it still takes an options (optionally, ha ha) because run_hooks() would require the caller to provide the hook list/hook path. Ok. Seems fine, and I like that the '_oneshot' naming change makes it less surprising that run_hooks_opt_clear() will get called for you.
Show 31 quoted lines
> ++
> ++ hook_path = find_hook(hook_name);
> ++ if (!hook_path) {
> ++ ret = 0;
> ++ goto cleanup;
> ++ }
> ++
> ++ ret = run_hooks(hook_name, hook_path, options);
> ++cleanup:
> ++ run_hooks_opt_clear(options);
> ++ return ret;
> ++}
> +
> + ## hook.h ##
> +@@ hook.h: void run_hooks_opt_clear(struct run_hooks_opt *o);
> + /**
> + * Takes an already resolved hook found via find_hook() and runs
> + * it. Does not call run_hooks_opt_clear() for you.
> ++ *
> ++ * See run_hooks_oneshot() for the simpler one-shot API.
> + */
> + int run_hooks(const char *hookname, const char *hook_path,
> + struct run_hooks_opt *options);
> ++
> ++/**
> ++ * Calls find_hook() on your "hook_name" and runs the hooks (if any)
> ++ * with run_hooks().
> ++ *
> ++ * If "options" is provided calls run_hooks_opt_clear() on it for
> ++ * you. If "options" is NULL a scratch one will be provided for you
> ++ * before calling run_hooks()."A scratch one will be provided for you" doesn't sound quite right - it's not exposed to the caller at all, but the comment sounds like you're handing the caller this scratch struct. Maybe it's better to say "the default options from RUN_HOOKS_OPT_INIT will be used"?
As a bonus, if you directly reference the initter macro, then it will automatically become clear to folks reading the documentation what the expected parallelism is on their hook, as the parallelism (_SERIES or _PARALLEL) is included on the name of the macro in my change later.
> ++ */ > ++int run_hooks_oneshot(const char *hook_name, struct run_hooks_opt *options); > ++ > + #endif
Show 17 quoted lines
> 9: e9a1e7cf61e ! 10: 3ee55d2c10f rebase: teach pre-rebase to use hook.h
> @@ Metadata
> Author: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
>
> ## Commit message ##
> - rebase: teach pre-rebase to use hook.h
> + rebase: convert pre-rebase to use hook.h
>
> Move the pre-rebase hook away from run-command.h to and over to the
> new hook.h library.
> @@ builtin/rebase.c: int cmd_rebase(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix
> if (!ok_to_skip_pre_rebase &&
> - run_hook_le(NULL, "pre-rebase", options.upstream_arg,
> - argc ? argv[0] : NULL, NULL))
> -+ run_hooks("pre-rebase", &hook_opt)) {
> -+ run_hooks_opt_clear(&hook_opt);
> ++ run_hooks_oneshot("pre-rebase", &hook_opt))Ok, it just uses the oneshot call instead. Looks good.
> 10: 1d087269303 ! 11: 050f20d14f0 am: convert applypatch hooks to use config > 11: 32eec5dc2f0 ! 12: ac875d284da hooks: convert 'post-checkout' hook to hook library > 12: e9fa3f67593 ! 13: 69763bc2255 merge: use config-based hooks for post-merge hook
The above all just use the oneshot instead, and have some minor tweaks to commit messages to lose references to the config. Looks good.
Show 11 quoted lines
> 13: 12347d901bb ! 14: 2ca1ca1b8e4 git hook run: add an --ignore-missing flag
> @@ Documentation/git-hook.txt: optional `--` (or `--end-of-options`, see linkgit:gi
> linkgit:githooks[5]
>
> ## builtin/hook.c ##
> +@@
> + #include "strvec.h"
> +
> + #define BUILTIN_HOOK_RUN_USAGE \
> +- N_("git hook run <hook-name> [-- <hook-args>]")
> ++ N_("git hook run [--ignore-missing] <hook-name> [-- <hook-args>]")Ok. We update the usage in the macro here instead. Nice.
Show 20 quoted lines
> @@ builtin/hook.c: static int run(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> - /*
> - * We are not using run_hooks() because we'd like to detect
> - * missing hooks. Let's find it ourselves and call
> -- * run_found_hooks() instead.
> -+ * run_found_hooks() instead...
> - */
> + git_config(git_default_config, NULL);
> +
> hook_name = argv[0];
> ++ if (ignore_missing)
> ++ return run_hooks_oneshot(hook_name, &opt);
> hook_path = find_hook(hook_name);
> if (!hook_path) {
> -+ /* ... act like run_hooks() under --ignore-missing */
> -+ if (ignore_missing)
> -+ return 0;
> error("cannot find a hook named %s", hook_name);
> - return 1;
> - }Hm. I actually think this was clearer before. I *think* that is because you and I have different opinions on the clarity of multiple returns :)
But I think it is a little confusing to say "ok, we will call an entirely different entry point in case of this one thing which we will have to check anyways".
Show 11 quoted lines
> 14: 71d209b4077 ! 15: 5b66b04bec7 send-email: use 'git hook run' for 'sendemail-validate'
> @@ git-send-email.perl: sub validate_patch {
> if ($repo) {
> + my $hook_name = 'sendemail-validate';
> my $hooks_path = $repo->command_oneline('rev-parse', '--git-path', 'hooks');
> -- my $validate_hook = catfile($hooks_path,
> + require File::Spec;
> +- my $validate_hook = File::Spec->catfile($hooks_path,
> - 'sendemail-validate');
> -+ my $validate_hook = catfile($hooks_path, $hook_name);
> ++ my $validate_hook = File::Spec->catfile($hooks_path, $hook_name);Ok, we are adapting to some other change around File::Spec that happened to git-send-email.perl elsewhere. The change to this patch looks good to me.
Show 28 quoted lines
> my $hook_error;
> if (-x $validate_hook) {
> - my $target = abs_path($fn);
> + require Cwd;
> @@ git-send-email.perl: sub validate_patch {
> chdir($repo->wc_path() or $repo->repo_path())
> or die("chdir: $!");
> 15: 246a82b55b2 = 16: 14a37a43db2 git-p4: use 'git hook' to run hooks
> 16: e3f8482d803 ! 17: ad5d0e0e7de commit: use hook.h to execute hooks
> @@ Metadata
> Author: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
>
> ## Commit message ##
> - commit: use hook.h to execute hooks
> + commit: convert {pre-commit,prepare-commit-msg} hook to hook.h
>
> - Teach run_commit_hook() to call hook.h instead of run-command.h. This
> - covers 'pre-commit', 'commit-msg', and
> - 'prepare-commit-msg'.
> -
> - Additionally, ask the hook library - not run-command - whether any
> - hooks will be run, as it's possible hooks may exist in the config but
> - not the hookdir.
> -
> - Because all but 'post-commit' hooks are expected to make some state
> - change, force all but 'post-commit' hook to run in series. 'post-commit'
> - "is meant primarily for notification, and cannot affect the outcome of
> - `git commit`," so it is fine to run in parallel.I am a little bummed that the patch reordering effectively removes the justification for parallel/serial execution for each hook from 'git blame'. Oh well.
Show 7 quoted lines
> + Move these hooks hook away from run-command.h to and over to the new > + hook.h library. > > Signed-off-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com> > Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> > > ## commit.c ##
Otherwise the main change here is dealing with other improvements earlier in the series, like 'hook_exists()' and 'run_hooks_oneshot()'. Looks fine.
Show 13 quoted lines
> 17: 6ed61071c5e ! 18: 3d3a33e2674 read-cache: convert post-index-change hook to use config > @@ Metadata > Author: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com> > > ## Commit message ## > - read-cache: convert post-index-change hook to use config > + read-cache: convert post-index-change to use hook.h > > - By using hook.h instead of run-command.h to run, post-index-change hooks > - can now be specified in the config in addition to the hookdir. > - post-index-change is not run anywhere besides in read-cache.c. > + Move the post-index-change hook away from run-command.h to and over to > + the new hook.h library.
I do not think it is necessary to drop the mention about 'post-index-change' being run anywhere else, but that's just a nit, not worth fixing :)
Show 11 quoted lines
>
> This removes the last direct user of run_hook_ve(), so we can make the
> function static now. It'll be removed entirely soon.
> @@ read-cache.c: static int do_write_locked_index(struct index_state *istate, struc
> + istate->updated_workdir ? "1" : "0",
> + istate->updated_skipworktree ? "1" : "0",
> + NULL);
> -+ run_hooks("post-index-change", &hook_opt);
> -+ run_hooks_opt_clear(&hook_opt);
> ++ run_hooks_oneshot("post-index-change", &hook_opt);
> +Mechanical change to using run_hooks_oneshot(). OK.
Show 12 quoted lines
> istate->updated_workdir = 0; > istate->updated_skipworktree = 0; > 18: e4ef3f4548a ! 19: 893f8666301 receive-pack: convert push-to-checkout hook to hook.h > @@ Metadata > ## Commit message ## > receive-pack: convert push-to-checkout hook to hook.h > > - By using hook.h instead of run-command.h to invoke push-to-checkout, > - hooks can now be specified in the config as well as in the hookdir. > - push-to-checkout is not called anywhere but in builtin/receive-pack.c. > + Move the push-to-checkout hook away from run-command.h to and over to > + the new hook.h library.
You made a comment in the commit before about the final instance of run_hook_ve; do you want to make a similar one here about run_hook_le?
The range-diff here is mechanical so looks fine to me.
Show 25 quoted lines
> 19: e3dda367ec9 = 20: 070433deba5 run-command: remove old run_hook_{le,ve}() hook API
> 20: 477d75bf579 = 21: 1028e0c1667 run-command: allow stdin for run_processes_parallel
> 21: b7c0ee9719a ! 22: 639e59e9ed0 hook: support passing stdin to hooks
> @@ Documentation/git-hook.txt: what those are.
>
> ## builtin/hook.c ##
> @@
> + #include "strvec.h"
>
> - static const char * const builtin_hook_usage[] = {
> - N_("git hook <command> [...]"),
> -- N_("git hook run <hook-name> [-- <hook-args>]"),
> -+ N_("git hook run [<args>] <hook-name> [-- <hook-args>]"),
> - NULL
> - };
> -
> - static const char * const builtin_hook_run_usage[] = {
> - N_("git hook run <hook-name> [-- <hook-args>]"),
> -+ N_("git hook run [--to-stdin=<path>] <hook-name> [-- <hook-args>]"),
> - NULL
> - };
> + #define BUILTIN_HOOK_RUN_USAGE \
> +- N_("git hook run [--ignore-missing] <hook-name> [-- <hook-args>]")
> ++ N_("git hook run [--ignore-missing] [--to-stdin=<path>] <hook-name> [-- <hook-args>]")
> Just coping with the macro instead of the duplicated strings. Ok.
The range-diff looks fine to me.
Show 34 quoted lines
> 22: 4035069a98c ! 23: 7d1925cca48 am: convert 'post-rewrite' hook to hook.h
> @@ builtin/am.c: static int run_applypatch_msg_hook(struct am_state *state)
> {
> - struct child_process cp = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> - const char *hook = find_hook("post-rewrite");
> -+ struct run_hooks_opt opt = RUN_HOOKS_OPT_INIT;
> - int ret;
> -
> +- int ret;
> +-
> - if (!hook)
> - return 0;
> -
> @@ builtin/am.c: static int run_applypatch_msg_hook(struct am_state *state)
> - cp.in = xopen(am_path(state, "rewritten"), O_RDONLY);
> - cp.stdout_to_stderr = 1;
> - cp.trace2_hook_name = "post-rewrite";
> -+ strvec_push(&opt.args, "rebase");
> -+ opt.path_to_stdin = am_path(state, "rewritten");
> ++ struct run_hooks_opt opt = RUN_HOOKS_OPT_INIT;
>
> - ret = run_command(&cp);
> -+ ret = run_hooks("post-rewrite", &opt);
> ++ strvec_push(&opt.args, "rebase");
> ++ opt.path_to_stdin = am_path(state, "rewritten");
>
> - close(cp.in);
> -+ run_hooks_opt_clear(&opt);
> - return ret;
> +- return ret;
> ++ return run_hooks_oneshot("post-rewrite", &opt);
> }
>
> + /**Man, the range-diff did a terrible job of summarizing this :)
The patch itself looks great, though, with the switch to using run_hooks_oneshot. Thanks.
Show 22 quoted lines
> 24: da46c859c1c ! 25: 05d1085f7eb hook: provide stdin by string_list or callback
> @@ hook.c: static int pick_next_hook(struct child_process *cp,
> } else {
> cp->no_stdin = 1;
> }
> -@@ hook.c: int run_found_hooks(const char *hook_name, const char *hook_path,
> - run_processes_parallel_tr2(options->jobs,
> +@@ hook.c: int run_hooks(const char *hook_name, const char *hook_path,
> + run_processes_parallel_tr2(jobs,
> pick_next_hook,
> notify_start_failure,
> - NULL,
> @@ hook.c: int run_found_hooks(const char *hook_name, const char *hook_path,
> notify_hook_finished,
> &cb_data,
> "hook",
> -@@ hook.c: int run_hooks(const char *hook_name, struct run_hooks_opt *options)
> +@@ hook.c: int run_hooks(const char *hook_name, const char *hook_path,
> +
> + if (options->absolute_path)
> + strbuf_release(&abs_path);
> ++ free(my_hook.feed_pipe_cb_data);Nice catch. Thanks.
Show 41 quoted lines
> 25: 7343be28ef4 ! 26: 4b7175af2e5 hook: convert 'post-rewrite' hook in sequencer.c to hook.h
> 26: 85bf13a0835 ! 27: 3f24e056410 transport: convert pre-push hook to use config
> @@ Metadata
> Author: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
>
> ## Commit message ##
> - transport: convert pre-push hook to use config
> + transport: convert pre-push hook to hook.h
>
> - By using the hook.h:run_hooks API, pre-push hooks can be specified in
> - the config as well as in the hookdir.
> + Move the pre-push hook away from run-command.h to and over to the new
> + hook.h library.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
> @@ transport.c: static void die_with_unpushed_submodules(struct string_list *needs_
> - int ret = 0, x;
> + int ret = 0;
> + struct run_hooks_opt opt = RUN_HOOKS_OPT_INIT;
> -+ struct strbuf tmp = STRBUF_INIT;
> struct ref *r;
> - struct child_process proc = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> - struct strbuf buf;
> @@ transport.c: static void die_with_unpushed_submodules(struct string_list *needs_
> - finish_command(&proc);
> - return -1;
> - }
> --
> -- sigchain_push(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN);
> -+ struct string_list to_stdin = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP;
> ++ struct string_list to_stdin = STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP;
>
> +- sigchain_push(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN);
> +-
> - strbuf_init(&buf, 256);
> + strvec_push(&opt.args, transport->remote->name);
> + strvec_push(&opt.args, transport->url);
>
> for (r = remote_refs; r; r = r->next) {
> ++ struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;Ah. It is not being freed because its lifetime is being managed by to_stdin instead. Ok, cool!
Show 34 quoted lines
> ++
> if (!r->peer_ref) continue;
> -@@ transport.c: static int run_pre_push_hook(struct transport *transport,
> + if (r->status == REF_STATUS_REJECT_NONFASTFORWARD) continue;
> + if (r->status == REF_STATUS_REJECT_STALE) continue;
> if (r->status == REF_STATUS_REJECT_REMOTE_UPDATED) continue;
> if (r->status == REF_STATUS_UPTODATE) continue;
>
> - strbuf_reset(&buf);
> - strbuf_addf( &buf, "%s %s %s %s\n",
> -+ strbuf_reset(&tmp);
> -+ strbuf_addf(&tmp, "%s %s %s %s",
> ++ strbuf_addf(&buf, "%s %s %s %s",
> r->peer_ref->name, oid_to_hex(&r->new_oid),
> r->name, oid_to_hex(&r->old_oid));
> -
> @@ transport.c: static int run_pre_push_hook(struct transport *transport,
> - ret = -1;
> - break;
> - }
> -+ string_list_append(&to_stdin, tmp.buf);
> ++ string_list_append(&to_stdin, strbuf_detach(&buf, NULL));
> }
>
> - strbuf_release(&buf);
> @@ transport.c: static int run_pre_push_hook(struct transport *transport,
> - x = finish_command(&proc);
> - if (!ret)
> - ret = x;
> -+ ret = run_hooks("pre-push", &opt);
> -+ run_hooks_opt_clear(&opt);
> -+ strbuf_release(&tmp);
> ++ ret = run_hooks_oneshot("pre-push", &opt);
> ++ to_stdin.strdup_strings = 1;And this is a typical change to the oneshot function. Cool.
Show 5 quoted lines
> + string_list_clear(&to_stdin, 0); > > return ret; > -: ----------- > 28: ecf75f33233 hook tests: test for exact "pre-push" hook input > -: ----------- > 29: 2c961be94b4 hook tests: use a modern style for "pre-push" tests
I'll take a look at these separately.
Show 41 quoted lines
> 27: 331014bad17 ! 30: 1ce456f9d9d reference-transaction: use hook.h to run hooks
> @@ refs.c: int ref_update_reject_duplicates(struct string_list *refnames,
> const char *state)
> {
> - struct child_process proc = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> - struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> +- struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> - const char *hook;
> + struct run_hooks_opt opt = RUN_HOOKS_OPT_INIT;
> -+ struct string_list to_stdin = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP;
> ++ struct string_list to_stdin = STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP;
> int ret = 0, i;
> -+ char o[GIT_MAX_HEXSZ + 1], n[GIT_MAX_HEXSZ + 1];
>
> - hook = find_hook("reference-transaction");
> - if (!hook)
> -+ if (!hook_exists("reference-transaction"))
> - return ret;
> -
> +- return ret;
> +-
> - strvec_pushl(&proc.args, hook, state, NULL);
> - proc.in = -1;
> - proc.stdout_to_stderr = 1;
> @@ refs.c: int ref_update_reject_duplicates(struct string_list *refnames,
> -
> - ret = start_command(&proc);
> - if (ret)
> -- return ret;
> --
> ++ if (!hook_exists("reference-transaction"))
> + return ret;
> +
> - sigchain_push(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN);
> + strvec_push(&opt.args, state);
>
> for (i = 0; i < transaction->nr; i++) {
> struct ref_update *update = transaction->updates[i];
> -+ oid_to_hex_r(o, &update->old_oid);
> -+ oid_to_hex_r(n, &update->new_oid);
> ++ struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;Ah, this is doing the same thing as with 'pre-push'. Cool.
Show 33 quoted lines
>
> - strbuf_reset(&buf);
> +- strbuf_reset(&buf);
> - strbuf_addf(&buf, "%s %s %s\n",
> -- oid_to_hex(&update->old_oid),
> -- oid_to_hex(&update->new_oid),
> -- update->refname);
> ++ strbuf_addf(&buf, "%s %s %s",
> + oid_to_hex(&update->old_oid),
> + oid_to_hex(&update->new_oid),
> + update->refname);
> -
> - if (write_in_full(proc.in, buf.buf, buf.len) < 0) {
> - if (errno != EPIPE)
> - ret = -1;
> - break;
> - }
> -+ strbuf_addf(&buf, "%s %s %s", o, n, update->refname);
> -+ string_list_append(&to_stdin, buf.buf);
> ++ string_list_append(&to_stdin, strbuf_detach(&buf, NULL));
> }
>
> - close(proc.in);
> - sigchain_pop(SIGPIPE);
> +- strbuf_release(&buf);
> + opt.feed_pipe = pipe_from_string_list;
> + opt.feed_pipe_ctx = &to_stdin;
> +
> -+ ret = run_hooks("reference-transaction", &opt);
> -+ run_hooks_opt_clear(&opt);
> - strbuf_release(&buf);
> ++ ret = run_hooks_oneshot("reference-transaction", &opt);
> ++ to_stdin.strdup_strings = 1;And turning on strdup_strings here means we will free them when we call string_list_clear. Ok.
Show 20 quoted lines
> + string_list_clear(&to_stdin, 0);
>
> - ret |= finish_command(&proc);
> 32: db70b59b3bd ! 35: ceef2f3e804 receive-pack: convert receive hooks to hook.h
> @@ builtin/receive-pack.c: static void hook_output_to_sideband(struct strbuf *outpu
> +{
> + struct run_hooks_opt opt = RUN_HOOKS_OPT_INIT;
> + struct receive_hook_feed_context ctx;
> -+ int rc;
> + struct command *iter = commands;
> +
> + /* if there are no valid commands, don't invoke the hook at all. */
> @@ builtin/receive-pack.c: static void hook_output_to_sideband(struct strbuf *outpu
> + if (!iter)
> + return 0;
> +
> -+ /* pre-receive hooks should run in series as the hook updates refs */
> -+ if (!strcmp(hook_name, "pre-receive"))
> -+ opt.jobs = 1;
> -+Hm, interesting. I'll note this as a case to watch for when I add the .jobs option back in.
Thanks. I'll take a look at the newly added/copied over patches next.
- Emily