Re: [PATCH v2 04/24] Documentation: build 'technical/bitmap-format' by default

> > I don't know if it's better to have a poorly-formatted HTML file, or
> > none at all. :)
> >
> > Personally, I would just read the source. And I have a slight concern
> > that if we start "cleaning it up" to render as asciidoc, the source
> > might end up a lot less readable (though I'd reserve judgement until
> > actually seeing it).
> 
> Yeah, the actual source is pretty readable (and it's what I had been
> looking at, although it is sometimes convenient to have a version I can
> read in my web browser). But it's definitely not good Asciidoc.
> 
> I briefly considered cleaning it up, but decided against it. Usually I
> would opt to clean it up, but this series is already so large that I
> figured it would make a negative impact on the reviewer experience to
> read a clean-up patch here.
> 
> I wouldn't be opposed to coming back to it in the future, once the dust
> settles. I guess we can consider this #leftoverbits until then.