Re: [PATCH 22/22] p5326: perf tests for MIDX bitmaps
- From
- Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
- Date
- May 4, 2021, 18:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20210504180058.2988580-1-jonathantanmy@google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <b75b534446088b20e77cbaa7f09705510ddec908.1617991824.git.me@ttaylorr.com>
> There is slight overhead in "simulated clone", "simulated partial > clone", and "clone (partial bitmap)". Unsurprisingly, that overhead is > due to using the MIDX's reverse index to map between bit positions and > MIDX positions.
Thanks - it's great to see that accessing a MIDX bitmap doesn't add much overhead (as compared to accessing a single-pack bitmap of the same size).
All the remaining patches up to and including this one look good. Overall, I did have some comments here and there, but I am happy with the overall design.