Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] bloom: optimize multiple pathspec items in revision
- From
Lidong Yan <502024330056@smail.nju.edu.cn>
- Date
- Jul 15, 2025, 01:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <55BF9B3C-F9B1-4ADB-9CBC-0D8EA45BA264@smail.nju.edu.cn>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqbjpmu2oz.fsf@gitster.g>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 26 quoted lines
> > Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> writes: > >> On 7/12/2025 5:51 AM, Lidong Yan wrote: >>> To enable optimize multiple pathspec items in revision traversal, >>> return 0 if all pathspec item is literal in forbid_bloom_filters(). >>> Add for loops to initialize and check each pathspec item's bloom_keyvec >>> when optimization is possible. >> >> The patch itself is good. >> >>> Signed-off-by: Lidong Yan <502024330056@smail.nju.edu.cn> >>> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> >> >> Here, I'll just point out that your sign-off should follow mine >> because you were the last to touch the patch. In this way, the >> sign-off gives a kind of timestamp to who made the most-recent >> changes (and that those changes have that person's sign-off, >> and may not have been vetted by previous signers). > > Thanks for pointing it out. Also perhaps a single-liner attribution > to clarify who did what, e.g. > > Signed-off-by: Derrick > [ly: did this and that to derrick's code to adjust] > Signed-off-by: Lidong
I will fix the order of the sign-offs, add the attributes, and resend PATCH v6 5/5.
Thanks, Lidong