git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

[PATCH v18 00/10] New proc-receive hook for centralized workflow

From
Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
Date
Aug 24, 2020, 17:41 UTC
Message-ID
<20200824174202.11710-1-worldhello.net@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<20200815171740.6257-1-worldhello.net@gmail.com>
From: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com>
## Changes since v17
Fixed all issues found in review on v17.
> Did I????  I do not think I deserve any credit here.
    @@ Commit message
         extended in latter commit just like what the "proc-receive" hook reports
         to "receive-pack".
     
    -    Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
         Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com>
> Does the last cast really needed, perhaps the caller is adding
> "const" to its objects where it is not needed, or the variable
> caller uses to receive the returned value of too loose a type?
     @@ builtin/receive-pack.c: static int run_update_hook(struct command *cmd)
      	return finish_command(&proc);
      }
      
    -+static struct command *find_command_by_refname(const struct command *list,
    ++static struct command *find_command_by_refname(struct command *list,
     +					       const char *refname)
     +{
     +	for (; list; list = list->next)
     +		if (!strcmp(list->ref_name, refname))
    -+			return (struct command *)list;
    ++			return list;
     +	return NULL;
     +}
     +
> Let BSS do its job by omitting " = 0;" and " = NULL;" at the end.
    @@ t/helper/test-proc-receive.c (new)
     +	NULL
     +};
     +
    -+static int die_version = 0;
    -+static int die_readline = 0;
    -+static int no_push_options = 0;
    -+static int use_atomic = 0;
    -+static int use_push_options = 0;
    -+static int verbose = 0;
    ++static int die_version;
    ++static int die_readline;
    ++static int no_push_options;
    ++static int use_atomic;
    ++static int use_push_options;
    ++static int verbose;
     +static int version = 1;
     +static struct string_list returns = STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP;
     +
Show 9 quoted lines
> This comment applies to all the patches in this series that adds the
> same pattern, but 
> 
>  * "ref->report.options" may be a good name in that it is a (linked)
>    list of options;
> 
>  * The variable that is used to iterate over the list points at one
>    of the elements on the list at any time, and is better called
>    'option' without 's' at the end.
Merge "struct ref_push_report_options" into "struct ref_push_report".
     @@ remote.h: int for_each_remote(each_remote_fn fn, void *priv);
      
      int remote_has_url(struct remote *remote, const char *url);
      
    -+struct ref_push_report_options {
    ++struct ref_push_report {
     +	const char *ref_name;
     +	struct object_id *old_oid;
     +	struct object_id *new_oid;
     +	unsigned int forced_update:1;
    -+	struct ref_push_report_options *next;
    -+};
    -+
    -+struct ref_push_report {
    -+	const char *message;
    -+	const char *error_message;
    -+	struct ref_push_report_options *options;
    ++	struct ref_push_report *next;
     +};
     +
      struct ref {
> If there was an error, the first one gets "ng" but all others say it
> was "ok"?  That smells somewhat strange.
> Would this one ever report a "ng" for an error?
Preserve "error_string" in command, and no "options" for an "ng" error.
    @@ builtin/receive-pack.c: static void write_head_info(void)
     +#define RUN_PROC_RECEIVE_RETURNED	2
      struct command {
      	struct command *next;
    --	const char *error_string;
    -+	struct ref_push_report report;
    + 	const char *error_string;
    ++	struct ref_push_report *report;
      	unsigned int skip_update:1,
     -		     did_not_exist:1;
     +		     did_not_exist:1,
    @@ builtin/receive-pack.c: static int run_update_hook(struct command *cmd)
     +{
     +	struct command *cmd;
     +	struct command *hint = NULL;
    ++	struct ref_push_report *report = NULL;
    ++	int new_report = 0;
     +	int code = 0;
    -+	int new_options = 1;
    ++	int once = 0;
     +
     +	for (;;) {
     +		struct object_id old_oid, new_oid;
    @@ builtin/receive-pack.c: static int run_update_hook(struct command *cmd)
     +		}
     +		*p++ = '\0';
     +		if (!strcmp(head, "option")) {
    -+			struct ref_push_report_options *options;
     +			const char *key, *val;
     +
    -+			if (!hint) {
    -+			       if (new_options) {
    ++			if (!hint || !(report || new_report)) {
    ++				if (!once++)
     +					strbuf_addstr(errmsg, "proc-receive reported 'option' without a matching 'ok/ng' directive\n");
    -+					new_options = 0;
    -+				}
     +				code = -1;
     +				continue;
     +			}
    -+			options = hint->report.options;
    -+			while (options && options->next)
    -+				options = options->next;
    -+			if (new_options) {
    -+				if (!options) {
    -+					hint->report.options = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct ref_push_report_options));
    -+					options = hint->report.options;
    ++			if (new_report) {
    ++				if (!hint->report) {
    ++					hint->report = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct ref_push_report));
    ++					report = hint->report;
     +				} else {
    -+					options->next = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct ref_push_report_options));
    -+					options = options->next;
    ++					report = hint->report;
    ++					while (report->next)
    ++						report = report->next;
    ++					report->next = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct ref_push_report));
    ++					report = report->next;
     +				}
    -+				new_options = 0;
    ++				new_report = 0;
     +			}
    -+			assert(options);
     +			key = p;
     +			p = strchr(key, ' ');
     +			if (p)
     +				*p++ = '\0';
     +			val = p;
     +			if (!strcmp(key, "refname"))
    -+				options->ref_name = xstrdup_or_null(val);
    ++				report->ref_name = xstrdup_or_null(val);
     +			else if (!strcmp(key, "old-oid") && val &&
     +				 !parse_oid_hex(val, &old_oid, &val))
    -+				options->old_oid = oiddup(&old_oid);
    ++				report->old_oid = oiddup(&old_oid);
     +			else if (!strcmp(key, "new-oid") && val &&
     +				 !parse_oid_hex(val, &new_oid, &val))
    -+				options->new_oid = oiddup(&new_oid);
    ++				report->new_oid = oiddup(&new_oid);
     +			else if (!strcmp(key, "forced-update"))
    -+				options->forced_update = 1;
    ++				report->forced_update = 1;
     +			else if (!strcmp(key, "fall-through"))
     +				/* Fall through, let 'receive-pack' to execute it. */
     +				hint->run_proc_receive = 0;
     +			continue;
     +		}
     +
    ++		report = NULL;
    ++		new_report = 0;
     +		refname = p;
     +		p = strchr(refname, ' ');
     +		if (p)
> Our naming convention avoids leading underscore (instead we use _1
> suffix, when we cannot come up with a better name).
Rename "_print_one_push_status" to "print_one_push_report".
    @@ transport.c: static void print_ok_ref_status(struct ref *ref, int porcelain, int
      
      		print_ref_status(type, quickref.buf, ref, ref->peer_ref, msg,
     -				 porcelain, summary_width);
    -+				 options, porcelain, summary_width);
    ++				 report, porcelain, summary_width);
      		strbuf_release(&quickref);
      	}
      }
      
     -static int print_one_push_status(struct ref *ref, const char *dest, int count,
    --				 int porcelain, int summary_width)
    -+static int _print_one_push_status(struct ref *ref, const char *dest, int count,
    -+				  struct ref_push_report_options *options,
    -+				  int porcelain, int summary_width)
    ++static int print_one_push_report(struct ref *ref, const char *dest, int count,
    ++				 struct ref_push_report *report,
    + 				 int porcelain, int summary_width)
      {
      	if (!count) {
    - 		char *url = transport_anonymize_url(dest);
Show 14 quoted lines
> I hate to see more helper functions turned into pieces that are
> impossible to reuse by gaining internal state like this.  Does this
> function have so many callers that makes it impractical to update
> its signature to have the pointer to a "state" structure passed by
> the caller?  This is called only from push_update_refs_status(), so
> you should be able to define a new structure that has the two fields
> 
> 	struct {
> 		struct ref *hint;
> 		int new_option;
> 	};
> 
> initialize an instance of it before push_update_refs_status() enters
> its endless loop, and pass a pointer to it to this helper function.
      ## transport-helper.c ##
    -@@ transport-helper.c: static int push_update_ref_status(struct strbuf *buf,
    +@@ transport-helper.c: static int fetch(struct transport *transport,
    + 	return -1;
    + }
    + 
    ++struct push_update_ref_state {
    ++	struct ref *hint;
    ++	struct ref_push_report *report;
    ++	int new_report;
    ++};
    ++
    + static int push_update_ref_status(struct strbuf *buf,
    +-				   struct ref **ref,
    ++				   struct push_update_ref_state *state,
    + 				   struct ref *remote_refs)
      {
      	char *refname, *msg;
      	int status, forced = 0;
    -+	static struct ref *hint = NULL;
    -+	static int new_options = 1;
    -+
    + 
     +	if (starts_with(buf->buf, "option ")) {
    -+		struct ref_push_report_options *options;
     +		struct object_id old_oid, new_oid;
     +		const char *key, *val;
     +		char *p;
     +
    -+		if (!hint)
    ++		if (!state->hint || !(state->report || state->new_report))
     +			die(_("'option' without a matching 'ok/error' directive"));
    -+		options = hint->report.options;
    -+		while (options && options->next)
    -+			options = options->next;
    -+		if (new_options) {
    -+			if (!options) {
    -+				hint->report.options = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct ref_push_report_options));
    -+				options = hint->report.options;
    ++		if (state->new_report) {
    ++			if (!state->hint->report) {
    ++				state->hint->report = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct ref_push_report));
    ++				state->report = state->hint->report;
     +			} else {
    -+				options->next = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct ref_push_report_options));
    -+				options = options->next;
    ++				state->report = state->hint->report;
    ++				while (state->report->next)
    ++					state->report = state->report->next;
    ++				state->report->next = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct ref_push_report));
    ++				state->report = state->report->next;
     +			}
    -+			new_options = 0;
    ++			state->new_report = 0;
     +		}
    -+		assert(options);
     +		key = buf->buf + 7;
     +		p = strchr(key, ' ');
     +		if (p)
     +			*p++ = '\0';
     +		val = p;
     +		if (!strcmp(key, "refname"))
    -+			options->ref_name = xstrdup_or_null(val);
    ++			state->report->ref_name = xstrdup_or_null(val);
     +		else if (!strcmp(key, "old-oid") && val &&
     +			 !parse_oid_hex(val, &old_oid, &val))
    -+			options->old_oid = oiddup(&old_oid);
    ++			state->report->old_oid = oiddup(&old_oid);
     +		else if (!strcmp(key, "new-oid") && val &&
     +			 !parse_oid_hex(val, &new_oid, &val))
    -+			options->new_oid = oiddup(&new_oid);
    ++			state->report->new_oid = oiddup(&new_oid);
     +		else if (!strcmp(key, "forced-update"))
    -+			options->forced_update = 1;
    ++			state->report->forced_update = 1;
     +		/* Not update remote namespace again. */
     +		return 1;
     +	}
    - 
    ++
    ++	state->report = NULL;
    ++	state->new_report = 0;
    ++
      	if (starts_with(buf->buf, "ok ")) {
      		status = REF_STATUS_OK;
    + 		refname = buf->buf + 3;
     @@ transport-helper.c: static int push_update_ref_status(struct strbuf *buf,
    - 		*ref = find_ref_by_name(remote_refs, refname);
    - 	if (!*ref) {
    + 		}
    + 	}
    + 
    +-	if (*ref)
    +-		*ref = find_ref_by_name(*ref, refname);
    +-	if (!*ref)
    +-		*ref = find_ref_by_name(remote_refs, refname);
    +-	if (!*ref) {
    ++	if (state->hint)
    ++		state->hint = find_ref_by_name(state->hint, refname);
    ++	if (!state->hint)
    ++		state->hint = find_ref_by_name(remote_refs, refname);
    ++	if (!state->hint) {
      		warning(_("helper reported unexpected status of %s"), refname);
    -+		hint = NULL;
      		return 1;
      	}
    -+	hint = *ref;
    -+	new_options = 1;
      
    - 	if ((*ref)->status != REF_STATUS_NONE) {
    +-	if ((*ref)->status != REF_STATUS_NONE) {
    ++	if (state->hint->status != REF_STATUS_NONE) {
      		/*
    + 		 * Earlier, the ref was marked not to be pushed, so ignore the ref
    + 		 * status reported by the remote helper if the latter is 'no match'.
     @@ transport-helper.c: static int push_update_ref_status(struct strbuf *buf,
    + 			return 1;
    + 	}
      
    - 	(*ref)->status = status;
    - 	(*ref)->forced_update |= forced;
    +-	(*ref)->status = status;
    +-	(*ref)->forced_update |= forced;
     -	(*ref)->remote_status = msg;
    -+	if (msg) {
    -+		if (status == REF_STATUS_OK)
    -+			(*ref)->report.message = msg;
    -+		else
    -+			(*ref)->report.error_message = msg;
    -+	}
    ++	if (status == REF_STATUS_OK)
    ++		state->new_report = 1;
    ++	state->hint->status = status;
    ++	state->hint->forced_update |= forced;
    ++	state->hint->remote_status = msg;
      	return !(status == REF_STATUS_OK);
      }
      
    +@@ transport-helper.c: static int push_update_refs_status(struct helper_data *data,
    + 				    struct ref *remote_refs,
    + 				    int flags)
    + {
    ++	struct ref *ref;
    ++	struct ref_push_report *report;
    + 	struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
    +-	struct ref *ref = remote_refs;
    +-	int ret = 0;
    ++	struct push_update_ref_state state = { remote_refs, NULL, 0 };
    + 
    + 	for (;;) {
    +-		char *private;
    +-
    + 		if (recvline(data, &buf)) {
    +-			ret = 1;
    +-			break;
    ++			strbuf_release(&buf);
    ++			return 1;
    + 		}
    +-
    + 		if (!buf.len)
    + 			break;
    ++		push_update_ref_status(&buf, &state, remote_refs);
    ++	}
    ++	strbuf_release(&buf);
    + 
    +-		if (push_update_ref_status(&buf, &ref, remote_refs))
    +-			continue;
    ++	if (flags & TRANSPORT_PUSH_DRY_RUN || !data->rs.nr || data->no_private_update)
    ++		return 0;
    + 
    +-		if (flags & TRANSPORT_PUSH_DRY_RUN || !data->rs.nr || data->no_private_update)
    +-			continue;
    ++	/* propagate back the update to the remote namespace */
    ++	for (ref = remote_refs; ref; ref = ref->next) {
    ++		char *private;
    + 
    +-		/* propagate back the update to the remote namespace */
    +-		private = apply_refspecs(&data->rs, ref->name);
    +-		if (!private)
    ++		if (ref->status != REF_STATUS_OK)
    + 			continue;
    +-		update_ref("update by helper", private, &ref->new_oid, NULL,
    +-			   0, 0);
    +-		free(private);
    ++
    ++		if (!ref->report) {
    ++			private = apply_refspecs(&data->rs, ref->name);
    ++			if (!private)
    ++				continue;
    ++			update_ref("update by helper", private, &(ref->new_oid),
    ++				   NULL, 0, 0);
    ++			free(private);
    ++		} else {
    ++			for (report = ref->report; report; report = report->next) {
    ++				private = apply_refspecs(&data->rs,
    ++							 report->ref_name
    ++							 ? report->ref_name
    ++							 : ref->name);
    ++				if (!private)
    ++					continue;
    ++				update_ref("update by helper", private,
    ++					   report->new_oid
    ++					   ? report->new_oid
    ++					   : &(ref->new_oid),
    ++					   NULL, 0, 0);
    ++				free(private);
    ++			}
    ++		}
    + 	}
    +-	strbuf_release(&buf);
    +-	return ret;
    ++	return 0;
    + }
    + 
    + static void set_common_push_options(struct transport *transport,
> Exactly the same comment as "don't turn helper functions that can be
> reused into unreusable ones by adding internal states" as one of the
> previous patches applies here.
 6:  ca4fc6d511 !  4:  60b9157a8e receive-pack: feed report options to post-receive
    @@ Commit message
         Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com>
     
      ## builtin/receive-pack.c ##
    -@@ builtin/receive-pack.c: static int feed_receive_hook(void *state_, const char **bufp, size_t *sizep)
    - {
    - 	struct receive_hook_feed_state *state = state_;
    - 	struct command *cmd = state->cmd;
    -+	static struct ref_push_report_options *options = NULL;
    +@@ builtin/receive-pack.c: static void prepare_push_cert_sha1(struct child_process *proc)
      
    - 	while (cmd &&
    - 	       state->skip_broken && (cmd->report.error_message || cmd->did_not_exist))
    + struct receive_hook_feed_state {
    + 	struct command *cmd;
    ++	struct ref_push_report *report;
    + 	int skip_broken;
    + 	struct strbuf buf;
    + 	const struct string_list *push_options;
    +@@ builtin/receive-pack.c: static int feed_receive_hook(void *state_, const char **bufp, size_t *sizep)
      		cmd = cmd->next;
      	if (!cmd)
      		return -1; /* EOF */
    @@ builtin/receive-pack.c: static int feed_receive_hook(void *state_, const char **
     -		    oid_to_hex(&cmd->old_oid), oid_to_hex(&cmd->new_oid),
     -		    cmd->ref_name);
     -	state->cmd = cmd->next;
    -+	if (!options)
    -+		options = cmd->report.options;
    -+	if (options) {
    ++	if (!state->report)
    ++		state->report = cmd->report;
    ++	if (state->report) {
     +		struct object_id *old_oid;
     +		struct object_id *new_oid;
     +		const char *ref_name;
     +
    -+		old_oid = options->old_oid ? options->old_oid : &cmd->old_oid;
    -+		new_oid = options->new_oid ? options->new_oid : &cmd->new_oid;
    -+		ref_name = options->ref_name ? options->ref_name : cmd->ref_name;
    ++		old_oid = state->report->old_oid ? state->report->old_oid : &cmd->old_oid;
    ++		new_oid = state->report->new_oid ? state->report->new_oid : &cmd->new_oid;
    ++		ref_name = state->report->ref_name ? state->report->ref_name : cmd->ref_name;
     +		strbuf_addf(&state->buf, "%s %s %s\n",
     +			    oid_to_hex(old_oid), oid_to_hex(new_oid),
     +			    ref_name);
    -+		options = options->next;
    -+		if (!options)
    ++		state->report = state->report->next;
    ++		if (!state->report)
     +			state->cmd = cmd->next;
     +	} else {
     +		strbuf_addf(&state->buf, "%s %s %s\n",
    +@@ builtin/receive-pack.c: static int run_receive_hook(struct command *commands,
    + 	strbuf_init(&state.buf, 0);
    + 	state.cmd = commands;
    + 	state.skip_broken = skip_broken;
    ++	state.report = NULL;
    + 	if (feed_receive_hook(&state, NULL, NULL))
    + 		return 0;
    + 	state.cmd = commands;
 
> Why not count "size_t len" before you make a copy of prefix with
> tail adjustment, so that you can do xmemdupz() at the end without
> need for potential overallocation? 
> Style:
> 	if (!proc_receive_ref) {
> 
> like you did below.
    @@ builtin/receive-pack.c: struct command {
     +		ref_pattern->want_delete = 1;
     +		ref_pattern->want_modify = 1;
     +	}
    -+	ref_pattern->next = NULL;
    -+	ref_pattern->ref_prefix = xstrdup(prefix);
    -+	len = strlen(ref_pattern->ref_prefix);
    -+	while (len && ref_pattern->ref_prefix[len - 1] == '/')
    -+		ref_pattern->ref_prefix[--len] = '\0';
    -+	if (proc_receive_ref == NULL) {
    ++	len = strlen(prefix);
    ++	while (len && prefix[len - 1] == '/')
    ++		len--;
    ++	ref_pattern->ref_prefix = xmemdupz(prefix, len);
    ++	if (!proc_receive_ref) {
     +		proc_receive_ref = ref_pattern;
     +	} else {
     +		struct proc_receive_ref *end;
> Shouldn't the "negate" bit be jsut another field that has
> want_{add,delete,modify}, so that proc_receive_ref_append()
> can parse it only once without these four lines?
    @@ builtin/receive-pack.c: static int keepalive_in_sec = 5;
     +static struct proc_receive_ref {
     +	unsigned int want_add:1,
     +		     want_delete:1,
    -+		     want_modify:1;
    ++		     want_modify:1,
    ++		     negative_ref:1;
     +	char *ref_prefix;
     +	struct proc_receive_ref *next;
    -+} *proc_receive_ref = NULL;
    ++} *proc_receive_ref;
     +
     +static void proc_receive_ref_append(const char *prefix);
     +
    @@ builtin/receive-pack.c: struct command {
     +				ref_pattern->want_delete = 1;
     +			else if (*prefix == 'm')
     +				ref_pattern->want_modify = 1;
    ++			else if (*prefix == '!')
    ++				ref_pattern->negative_ref = 1;
     +			prefix++;
     +		}
     +		prefix++;
    @@ builtin/receive-pack.c: struct command {
     +
     +	for (p = proc_receive_ref; p; p = p->next) {
     +		const char *match = p->ref_prefix;
    -+		int neg = 0;
     +		const char *remains;
     +
     +		if (!p->want_add && is_null_oid(&cmd->old_oid))
    @@ builtin/receive-pack.c: struct command {
     +			 !is_null_oid(&cmd->new_oid))
     +			continue;
     +
    -+		if (*match == '!') {
    -+			neg = 1;
    -+			match++;
    -+		}
    -+
     +		if (skip_prefix(cmd->ref_name, match, &remains) &&
     +		    (!*remains || *remains == '/')) {
    -+			if (!neg)
    ++			if (!p->negative_ref)
     +				return 1;
    -+		} else if (neg) {
    ++		} else if (p->negative_ref) {
     +			return 1;
     +		}
     +	}
    @@ t/t5411/test-0050-proc-receive-refs.sh (new)
     +		git config --unset-all receive.procReceiveRefs &&
     +		git config --add receive.procReceiveRefs m:refs/heads/master &&
     +		git config --add receive.procReceiveRefs ad:refs/heads &&
    -+		git config --add receive.procReceiveRefs "a:!refs/heads"
    ++		git config --add receive.procReceiveRefs "a!:refs/heads"
     +	)
     +'
     +
---
Jiang Xin (10):
  transport: not report a non-head push as a branch
  t5411: add basic test cases for proc-receive hook
  receive-pack: add new proc-receive hook
  receive-pack: feed report options to post-receive
  New capability "report-status-v2" for git-push
  doc: add document for capability report-status-v2
  receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefs
  t5411: test updates of remote-tracking branches
  transport: parse report options for tracking refs
  doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hook
 Documentation/config/receive.txt              |  21 +
 Documentation/githooks.txt                    |  62 +++
 Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt     |  43 +-
 .../technical/protocol-capabilities.txt       |  17 +-
 Makefile                                      |   1 +
 builtin/receive-pack.c                        | 472 +++++++++++++++++-
 builtin/send-pack.c                           |  19 +
 remote.h                                      |   9 +
 send-pack.c                                   | 101 +++-
 t/helper/test-proc-receive.c                  | 176 +++++++
 t/helper/test-tool.c                          |   1 +
 t/helper/test-tool.h                          |   1 +
 t/t5411-proc-receive-hook.sh                  | 117 +++++
 t/t5411/common-functions.sh                   |  56 +++
 t/t5411/once-0010-report-status-v1.sh         |  94 ++++
 t/t5411/test-0000-standard-git-push.sh        | 143 ++++++
 .../test-0001-standard-git-push--porcelain.sh | 147 ++++++
 t/t5411/test-0002-pre-receive-declined.sh     |  33 ++
 ...st-0003-pre-receive-declined--porcelain.sh |  34 ++
 t/t5411/test-0010-proc-receive-settings.sh    |   7 +
 t/t5411/test-0011-no-hook-error.sh            |  64 +++
 t/t5411/test-0012-no-hook-error--porcelain.sh |  66 +++
 t/t5411/test-0013-bad-protocol.sh             | 217 ++++++++
 t/t5411/test-0014-bad-protocol--porcelain.sh  | 160 ++++++
 t/t5411/test-0020-report-ng.sh                |  67 +++
 t/t5411/test-0021-report-ng--porcelain.sh     |  69 +++
 t/t5411/test-0022-report-unexpect-ref.sh      |  45 ++
 ...est-0023-report-unexpect-ref--porcelain.sh |  46 ++
 t/t5411/test-0024-report-unknown-ref.sh       |  34 ++
 ...test-0025-report-unknown-ref--porcelain.sh |  35 ++
 t/t5411/test-0026-push-options.sh             |  79 +++
 t/t5411/test-0027-push-options--porcelain.sh  |  82 +++
 t/t5411/test-0030-report-ok.sh                |  35 ++
 t/t5411/test-0031-report-ok--porcelain.sh     |  36 ++
 t/t5411/test-0032-report-with-options.sh      | 256 ++++++++++
 ...est-0033-report-with-options--porcelain.sh | 265 ++++++++++
 t/t5411/test-0034-report-ft.sh                |  44 ++
 t/t5411/test-0035-report-ft--porcelain.sh     |  45 ++
 ...t-0036-report-multi-rewrite-for-one-ref.sh | 227 +++++++++
 ...rt-multi-rewrite-for-one-ref--porcelain.sh | 172 +++++++
 t/t5411/test-0038-report-mixed-refs.sh        |  89 ++++
 .../test-0039-report-mixed-refs--porcelain.sh |  91 ++++
 t/t5411/test-0040-process-all-refs.sh         | 113 +++++
 .../test-0041-process-all-refs--porcelain.sh  | 114 +++++
 t/t5411/test-0050-proc-receive-refs.sh        | 128 +++++
 t/t5516-fetch-push.sh                         |   2 +-
 transport-helper.c                            | 128 +++--
 transport.c                                   | 159 ++++--
 48 files changed, 4320 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 t/helper/test-proc-receive.c
 create mode 100755 t/t5411-proc-receive-hook.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/common-functions.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/once-0010-report-status-v1.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0000-standard-git-push.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0001-standard-git-push--porcelain.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0002-pre-receive-declined.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0003-pre-receive-declined--porcelain.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0010-proc-receive-settings.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0011-no-hook-error.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0012-no-hook-error--porcelain.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0013-bad-protocol.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0014-bad-protocol--porcelain.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0020-report-ng.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0021-report-ng--porcelain.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0022-report-unexpect-ref.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0023-report-unexpect-ref--porcelain.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0024-report-unknown-ref.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0025-report-unknown-ref--porcelain.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0026-push-options.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0027-push-options--porcelain.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0030-report-ok.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0031-report-ok--porcelain.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0032-report-with-options.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0033-report-with-options--porcelain.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0034-report-ft.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0035-report-ft--porcelain.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0036-report-multi-rewrite-for-one-ref.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0037-report-multi-rewrite-for-one-ref--porcelain.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0038-report-mixed-refs.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0039-report-mixed-refs--porcelain.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0040-process-all-refs.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0041-process-all-refs--porcelain.sh
 create mode 100644 t/t5411/test-0050-proc-receive-refs.sh
-- 
2.26.2.543.ge7de2a6e37
Previous: Jiang XinNext: Jiang Xin
Message 144 of 266 in “New execute-commands hook for centralized workflow”
  1. 0/7 New execute-commands hook for centralized workflowJiang Xin, Mar 4, 2020
  2. 2/7 receive-pack: feed all commands to post-receiveJiang Xin, Mar 4, 2020
  3. 1/7 receive-pack: new external execute-commands hookJiang Xin, Mar 4, 2020
  4. 3/7 receive-pack: try `execute-commands --pre-receive`Jiang Xin, Mar 4, 2020
  5. 4/7 receive-pack: read env from execute-commands outputJiang Xin, Mar 4, 2020
  6. 5/7 refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden()Jiang Xin, Mar 4, 2020
  7. 6/7 receive-pack: new config receive.executeCommandsHookRefsJiang Xin, Mar 4, 2020
  8. 7/7 hook: add document and example for "execute-commands" hookJiang Xin, Mar 4, 2020
  9. Junio C HamanoMar 4, 2020
  10. Jiang XinMar 5, 2020
  11. 0/5 New proc-receive hook for centralized workflowJiang Xin, Mar 8, 2020
  12. 1/5 receive-pack: add new proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Mar 8, 2020
  13. Junio C HamanoMar 9, 2020
  14. Jiang XinMar 10, 2020
  15. 0/4 New proc-receive hook for centralized workflowJiang Xin, Mar 13, 2020
  16. 0/5 New proc-receive hook for centralized workflowJiang Xin, Mar 22, 2020
  17. Junio C HamanoMar 25, 2020
  18. 1/5 transport: not report a non-head push as a branchJiang Xin, Mar 22, 2020
  19. Junio C HamanoMar 25, 2020
  20. 3/5 refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden()Jiang Xin, Mar 22, 2020
  21. 4/5 receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefsJiang Xin, Mar 22, 2020
  22. 2/5 receive-pack: add new proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Mar 22, 2020
  23. 1/3 t5543: never report what we do not pushJiang Xin, Mar 25, 2020
  24. Junio C HamanoMar 25, 2020
  25. Jiang XinMar 26, 2020
  26. 0/3 Never report references we not pushJiang Xin, Mar 25, 2020
  27. 0/4 Never report references we not pushJiang Xin, Mar 29, 2020
  28. Jiang XinMar 29, 2020
  29. 1/5 send-pack: fix inconsistent porcelain outputJiang Xin, Apr 16, 2020
  30. 0/5 fix git-push porcelain output and atomic report issueJiang Xin, Apr 16, 2020
  31. 0/5 fix git-push porcelain output and atomic report issueJiang Xin, Apr 17, 2020
  32. 2/5 t5543: never report what we do not pushJiang Xin, Apr 17, 2020
  33. 1/5 send-pack: fix inconsistent porcelain outputJiang Xin, Apr 17, 2020
  34. Junio C HamanoApr 17, 2020
  35. 4/5 transport-helper: mark failure for atomic pushJiang Xin, Apr 17, 2020
  36. 3/5 send-pack: mark failure of atomic push properlyJiang Xin, Apr 17, 2020
  37. 5/5 transport-helper: new method reject_atomic_push()Jiang Xin, Apr 17, 2020
  38. 2/5 t5543: never report what we do not pushJiang Xin, Apr 16, 2020
  39. 3/5 send-pack: mark failure of atomic push properlyJiang Xin, Apr 16, 2020
  40. 4/5 transport-helper: mark failure for atomic pushJiang Xin, Apr 16, 2020
  41. 5/5 transport-helper: new method reject_atomic_push()Jiang Xin, Apr 16, 2020
  42. 1/4 t5543: never report what we do not pushJiang Xin, Mar 29, 2020
  43. 2/4 send-pack: mark failure of atomic push properlyJiang Xin, Mar 29, 2020
  44. 4/4 transport-helper: new method reject_atomic_push()Jiang Xin, Mar 29, 2020
  45. 3/4 transport-helper: mark failure for atomic pushJiang Xin, Mar 29, 2020
  46. 2/3 send-pack: mark failure of atomic push properlyJiang Xin, Mar 25, 2020
  47. Junio C HamanoMar 25, 2020
  48. 3/3 transport-helper: enforce atomic in push_refs_with_pushJiang Xin, Mar 25, 2020
  49. Junio C HamanoMar 25, 2020
  50. 5/5 receive-pack: refactor report for proc-receiveJiang Xin, Mar 22, 2020
  51. 1/4 receive-pack: add new proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Mar 13, 2020
  52. 2/4 receive-pack: refactor report for proc-receiveJiang Xin, Mar 13, 2020
  53. 4/4 receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefsJiang Xin, Mar 13, 2020
  54. 3/4 refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden()Jiang Xin, Mar 13, 2020
  55. 2/5 refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden()Jiang Xin, Mar 8, 2020
  56. 3/5 receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefsJiang Xin, Mar 8, 2020
  57. 4/5 receive-pack: read env from proc-receive outputJiang Xin, Mar 8, 2020
  58. 5/5 hook: add document and example for "proc-receive" hookJiang Xin, Mar 8, 2020
  59. 1/6 transport: not report a non-head push as a branchJiang Xin, Mar 30, 2020
  60. 0/6 New proc-receive hook for centralized workflowJiang Xin, Mar 30, 2020
  61. 4/6 receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefsJiang Xin, Mar 30, 2020
  62. 5/6 receive-pack: refactor report for proc-receiveJiang Xin, Mar 30, 2020
  63. 2/6 receive-pack: add new proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Mar 30, 2020
  64. Junio C HamanoMar 31, 2020
  65. Junio C HamanoMar 31, 2020
  66. 6/6 doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Mar 30, 2020
  67. 3/6 refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden()Jiang Xin, Mar 30, 2020
  68. 3/7 refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden()Jiang Xin, Apr 2, 2020
  69. 1/7 transport: not report a non-head push as a branchJiang Xin, Apr 2, 2020
  70. 4/7 receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefsJiang Xin, Apr 2, 2020
  71. 2/7 receive-pack: add new proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Apr 2, 2020
  72. 0/7 New proc-receive hook for centralized workflowJiang Xin, Apr 2, 2020
  73. Junio C HamanoApr 2, 2020
  74. 1/7 transport: not report a non-head push as a branchJiang Xin, Apr 3, 2020
  75. 3/7 refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden()Jiang Xin, Apr 3, 2020
  76. 2/7 receive-pack: add new proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Apr 3, 2020
  77. 5/7 receive-pack: refactor report for proc-receiveJiang Xin, Apr 3, 2020
  78. 4/7 receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefsJiang Xin, Apr 3, 2020
  79. 0/7 New proc-receive hook for centralized workflowJiang Xin, Apr 3, 2020
  80. 0/7 New proc-receive hook for centralized workflowJiang Xin, Apr 4, 2020
  81. 0/6 New proc-receive hook for centralized workflowJiang Xin, Apr 7, 2020
  82. 1/8 transport: not report a non-head push as a branchJiang Xin, Apr 12, 2020
  83. Junio C HamanoApr 12, 2020
  84. Jiang XinApr 13, 2020
  85. 0/8 New proc-receive hook for centralized workflowJiang Xin, Apr 12, 2020
  86. 0/7 New proc-receive hook for centralized workflowJiang Xin, Apr 13, 2020
  87. 1/7 transport: not report a non-head push as a branchJiang Xin, Apr 13, 2020
  88. 3/7 receive-pack: add new proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Apr 13, 2020
  89. 6/7 receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefsJiang Xin, Apr 13, 2020
  90. 5/7 refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden()Jiang Xin, Apr 13, 2020
  91. 7/7 doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Apr 13, 2020
  92. 2/7 connect: export parse_feature_value()Jiang Xin, Apr 13, 2020
  93. 4/7 send-pack: extension for client-side status reportJiang Xin, Apr 13, 2020
  94. 3/8 refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden()Jiang Xin, Apr 12, 2020
  95. Junio C HamanoApr 12, 2020
  96. Jiang XinApr 13, 2020
  97. 2/8 receive-pack: add new proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Apr 12, 2020
  98. Junio C HamanoApr 12, 2020
  99. Jiang XinApr 13, 2020
  100. Junio C HamanoApr 13, 2020
  101. 1/7 transport: not report a non-head push as a branchJiang Xin, Apr 14, 2020
  102. 0/7 New proc-receive hook for centralized workflowJiang Xin, Apr 14, 2020
  103. 1/8 transport: not report a non-head push as a branchJiang Xin, Apr 18, 2020
  104. 0/8 New proc-receive hook for centralized workflowJiang Xin, Apr 18, 2020
  105. 2/8 connect: export parse_feature_value()Jiang Xin, Apr 18, 2020
  106. 4/8 send-pack: extension for client-side status reportJiang Xin, Apr 18, 2020
  107. 8/8 doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Apr 18, 2020
  108. 6/8 refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden()Jiang Xin, Apr 18, 2020
  109. 7/8 receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefsJiang Xin, Apr 18, 2020
  110. 5/8 receive-pack: feed extended_status to post-receiveJiang Xin, Apr 18, 2020
  111. 3/8 receive-pack: add new proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Apr 18, 2020
  112. 2/7 connect: export parse_feature_value()Jiang Xin, Apr 14, 2020
  113. 3/7 receive-pack: add new proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Apr 14, 2020
  114. Junio C HamanoApr 15, 2020
  115. Jiang XinApr 15, 2020
  116. Junio C HamanoApr 15, 2020
  117. Jiang XinApr 27, 2020
  118. Jeff KingApr 29, 2020
  119. Jiang XinApr 30, 2020
  120. 1/7 transport: not report a non-head push as a branchJiang Xin, May 5, 2020
  121. 0/7 New proc-receive hook for centralized workflowJiang Xin, May 5, 2020
  122. Junio C HamanoMay 6, 2020
  123. Jiang XinMay 7, 2020
  124. Jiang XinMay 7, 2020
  125. 1/7 transport: not report a non-head push as a branchJiang Xin, May 7, 2020
  126. 0/7 New proc-receive hook for centralized workflowJiang Xin, May 7, 2020
  127. 01/11 transport: not report a non-head push as a branchJiang Xin, May 18, 2020
  128. 00/11 New proc-receive hook for centralized workflowJiang Xin, May 18, 2020
  129. 08/10 t5411: test updates of remote-tracking branchesJiang Xin, Aug 15, 2020
  130. 01/10 transport: not report a non-head push as a branchJiang Xin, Aug 15, 2020
  131. 10/10 doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Aug 15, 2020
  132. 06/10 receive-pack: feed report options to post-receiveJiang Xin, Aug 15, 2020
  133. Junio C HamanoAug 17, 2020
  134. 03/10 receive-pack: add new proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Aug 15, 2020
  135. Junio C HamanoAug 17, 2020
  136. 07/10 receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefsJiang Xin, Aug 15, 2020
  137. Junio C HamanoAug 17, 2020
  138. 05/10 doc: add document for capability report-status-v2Jiang Xin, Aug 15, 2020
  139. 02/10 t5411: add basic test cases for proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Aug 15, 2020
  140. 04/10 New capability "report-status-v2" for git-pushJiang Xin, Aug 15, 2020
  141. Junio C HamanoAug 17, 2020
  142. 09/10 transport: parse report options for tracking refsJiang Xin, Aug 15, 2020
  143. 00/10 New proc-receive hook for centralized workflowJiang Xin, Aug 15, 2020
  144. 00/10 New proc-receive hook for centralized workflowJiang Xin, Aug 24, 2020
  145. 01/10 transport: not report a non-head push as a branchJiang Xin, Aug 27, 2020
  146. 00/10 New proc-receive hook for centralized workflowJiang Xin, Aug 27, 2020
  147. Junio C HamanoAug 27, 2020
  148. 02/10 t5411: add basic test cases for proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Aug 27, 2020
  149. 04/10 receive-pack: feed report options to post-receiveJiang Xin, Aug 27, 2020
  150. 07/10 receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefsJiang Xin, Aug 27, 2020
  151. 03/10 receive-pack: add new proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Aug 27, 2020
  152. Johannes SchindelinNov 4, 2020
  153. Johannes SchindelinNov 4, 2020
  154. Jiang XinNov 5, 2020
  155. t5411: fix broken pipe write error on proc-receiveJiang Xin, Nov 5, 2020
  156. Junio C HamanoNov 5, 2020
  157. t5411: consistent result for proc-receive broken testJiang Xin, Nov 7, 2020
  158. Jiang XinNov 9, 2020
  159. t5411: consistent result for proc-receive broken testJiang Xin, Nov 9, 2020
  160. Junio C HamanoNov 9, 2020
  161. Jeff KingNov 9, 2020
  162. Junio C HamanoNov 9, 2020
  163. Jeff KingNov 10, 2020
  164. Jiang XinNov 10, 2020
  165. 1/2 t5411: refactor make_user_friendly_and_stable_outputJiang Xin, Nov 10, 2020
  166. Junio C HamanoNov 10, 2020
  167. Jiang XinNov 11, 2020
  168. 2/2 receive-pack: gently write messages to proc-receiveJiang Xin, Nov 10, 2020
  169. Jeff KingNov 10, 2020
  170. Jiang XinNov 11, 2020
  171. Junio C HamanoNov 10, 2020
  172. Junio C HamanoNov 10, 2020
  173. 1/3 t5411: new helper filter_out_user_friendly_and_stable_outputJiang Xin, Nov 11, 2020
  174. 0/3 jx/t5411-flake-fixJiang Xin, Nov 11, 2020
  175. 2/3 receive-pack: gently write messages to proc-receiveJiang Xin, Nov 11, 2020
  176. 3/3 receive-pack: use default version 0 for proc-receiveJiang Xin, Nov 11, 2020
  177. Jiang XinNov 10, 2020
  178. Junio C HamanoNov 5, 2020
  179. SZEDER GáborJan 17, 2021
  180. Jiang XinJan 18, 2021
  181. SZEDER GáborJan 20, 2021
  182. Jiang XinJan 21, 2021
  183. SZEDER GáborJan 21, 2021
  184. 2/2 t5411: refactor check of refs using test_cmp_refsJiang Xin, Jan 18, 2021
  185. 1/2 t5411: remove file after use to prevent overwritingJiang Xin, Jan 18, 2021
  186. Johannes SixtJan 18, 2021
  187. Jiang XinJan 19, 2021
  188. 1/2 t5411: use different out file to prevent overwritingJiang Xin, Jan 19, 2021
  189. SZEDER GáborJan 20, 2021
  190. 2/2 t5411: refactor check of refs using test_cmp_refsJiang Xin, Jan 21, 2021
  191. 1/2 t5411: use different out file to prevent overwritingJiang Xin, Jan 21, 2021
  192. 0/2 use unique out file in t5411Jiang Xin, Jan 21, 2021
  193. Junio C HamanoFeb 11, 2021
  194. Jiang XinFeb 13, 2021
  195. Jiang XinJan 21, 2021
  196. 2/2 t5411: refactor check of refs using test_cmp_refsJiang Xin, Jan 19, 2021
  197. 0/2 t5411 out file overwrite fixJiang Xin, Jan 19, 2021
  198. 05/10 New capability "report-status-v2" for git-pushJiang Xin, Aug 27, 2020
  199. 08/10 t5411: test updates of remote-tracking branchesJiang Xin, Aug 27, 2020
  200. 09/10 transport: parse report options for tracking refsJiang Xin, Aug 27, 2020
  201. 06/10 doc: add document for capability report-status-v2Jiang Xin, Aug 27, 2020
  202. 10/10 doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Aug 27, 2020
  203. 01/10 transport: not report a non-head push as a branchJiang Xin, Aug 24, 2020
  204. 02/10 t5411: add basic test cases for proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Aug 24, 2020
  205. 03/10 receive-pack: add new proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Aug 24, 2020
  206. 04/10 receive-pack: feed report options to post-receiveJiang Xin, Aug 24, 2020
  207. 06/10 doc: add document for capability report-status-v2Jiang Xin, Aug 24, 2020
  208. 07/10 receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefsJiang Xin, Aug 24, 2020
  209. 08/10 t5411: test updates of remote-tracking branchesJiang Xin, Aug 24, 2020
  210. 09/10 transport: parse report options for tracking refsJiang Xin, Aug 24, 2020
  211. 05/10 New capability "report-status-v2" for git-pushJiang Xin, Aug 24, 2020
  212. 10/10 doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Aug 24, 2020
  213. 02/11 t5411: add basic test cases for proc-receive hookJiang Xin, May 18, 2020
  214. 04/11 New capability "report-status-v2" for git-pushJiang Xin, May 18, 2020
  215. 03/11 receive-pack: add new proc-receive hookJiang Xin, May 18, 2020
  216. 06/11 receive-pack: feed report options to post-receiveJiang Xin, May 18, 2020
  217. 07/11 refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden()Jiang Xin, May 18, 2020
  218. 09/11 t5411: test updates of remote-tracking branchesJiang Xin, May 18, 2020
  219. 08/11 receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefsJiang Xin, May 18, 2020
  220. 10/11 transport: parse report options for tracking refsJiang Xin, May 18, 2020
  221. 11/11 doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hookJiang Xin, May 18, 2020
  222. 05/11 doc: add document for capability report-status-v2Jiang Xin, May 18, 2020
  223. 4/7 receive-pack: feed report options to post-receiveJiang Xin, May 7, 2020
  224. 3/7 New capability "report-status-v2" for git-pushJiang Xin, May 7, 2020
  225. 5/7 refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden()Jiang Xin, May 7, 2020
  226. 2/7 receive-pack: add new proc-receive hookJiang Xin, May 7, 2020
  227. 6/7 receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefsJiang Xin, May 7, 2020
  228. 7/7 doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hookJiang Xin, May 7, 2020
  229. 3/7 New capability "report-status-v2" for git-pushJiang Xin, May 5, 2020
  230. 8/7 fixup! New capability "report-status-v2" for git-pushJiang Xin, May 5, 2020
  231. 4/7 receive-pack: feed report options to post-receiveJiang Xin, May 5, 2020
  232. 7/7 doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hookJiang Xin, May 5, 2020
  233. 6/7 receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefsJiang Xin, May 5, 2020
  234. 2/7 receive-pack: add new proc-receive hookJiang Xin, May 5, 2020
  235. 5/7 refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden()Jiang Xin, May 5, 2020
  236. Jeff KingMay 7, 2020
  237. 4/7 send-pack: extension for client-side status reportJiang Xin, Apr 14, 2020
  238. Junio C HamanoApr 15, 2020
  239. 5/7 refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden()Jiang Xin, Apr 14, 2020
  240. 7/7 doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Apr 14, 2020
  241. 6/7 receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefsJiang Xin, Apr 14, 2020
  242. 6/8 receive-pack: extension for server-side reportJiang Xin, Apr 12, 2020
  243. 8/8 doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Apr 12, 2020
  244. 7/8 send-pack: extension for client-side status reportJiang Xin, Apr 12, 2020
  245. 4/8 receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefsJiang Xin, Apr 12, 2020
  246. Junio C HamanoApr 12, 2020
  247. Jiang XinApr 13, 2020
  248. 5/8 connect: export parse_feature_value()Jiang Xin, Apr 12, 2020
  249. 1/6 transport: not report a non-head push as a branchJiang Xin, Apr 7, 2020
  250. 3/6 refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden()Jiang Xin, Apr 7, 2020
  251. 2/6 receive-pack: add new proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Apr 7, 2020
  252. 4/6 receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefsJiang Xin, Apr 7, 2020
  253. 6/6 doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Apr 7, 2020
  254. 5/6 receive-pack: refactor report for proc-receiveJiang Xin, Apr 7, 2020
  255. 1/7 transport: not report a non-head push as a branchJiang Xin, Apr 4, 2020
  256. 3/7 refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden()Jiang Xin, Apr 4, 2020
  257. 4/7 receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefsJiang Xin, Apr 4, 2020
  258. 7/7 doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Apr 4, 2020
  259. 2/7 receive-pack: add new proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Apr 4, 2020
  260. 5/7 receive-pack: refactor report for proc-receiveJiang Xin, Apr 4, 2020
  261. 6/7 t5412: test the proc-receive hook on HTTP protocolJiang Xin, Apr 4, 2020
  262. 7/7 doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Apr 3, 2020
  263. 6/7 t5412: test proc-receive hook on HTTP protocolJiang Xin, Apr 3, 2020
  264. 5/7 receive-pack: refactor report for proc-receiveJiang Xin, Apr 2, 2020
  265. 7/7 doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hookJiang Xin, Apr 2, 2020
  266. 6/7 t5412: test proc-receive hook on HTTP protocolJiang Xin, Apr 2, 2020

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.