Re: [PATCH v2] ci: allow per-branch config for GitHub Actions
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- May 7, 2020, 20:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20200507204626.GG29683@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqwo5n34ka.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 12:53:09PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>
> > + - id: check-ref
> > + name: check whether CI is enabled for ref
> > + run: |
> > + enabled=yes
> > + if test -x config-repo/ci/config/allow-ref &&
> > + ! config-repo/ci/config/allow-ref '${{ github.ref }}'
>
> Is it deliberate that the output from the script is not redirected
> to >/dev/null, which would mean they are allowed to do something
> that looks like:
>
> echo "::set-output name=enabled::frotz"
>
> or emit other random ::string-that-affects-github-actions to its
> standard output stream?It was deliberate in the sense that I would allow them to write useful messages to the Actions log. If they want to do nonsense like "::set-output", then it's their foot and their gun.
I don't know if Actions distinguishes between stdout and stderr here (i.e., if we redirected the script's stdout to stderr, would that prevent this case or not?).
-Peff