Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] t3301: use test_must_fail instead of !
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 01:46:28AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Even if they were in POSIX, I'd suggest not to change the constructs.
> rebase is _bound_ to be built in.
>
> Even if Stephan is not a fan of my recent changes to rebase -i -p (which I
> will present on this list once they all work as I want them to), I think I
> can talk him into continuing the sequencer effort: he was not discussing
> the design in the open, so he should have expected the process to be
> dragged out.
Having a sequencer in C would make me even happier. ;)
-Peff