From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:46:33 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] t3301: use test_must_fail instead of !
Message-ID: <20090219004633.GC25808@coredump.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0902190142440.10279@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 01:46:28AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> Even if they were in POSIX, I'd suggest not to change the constructs.  
> rebase is _bound_ to be built in.
> 
> Even if Stephan is not a fan of my recent changes to rebase -i -p (which I 
> will present on this list once they all work as I want them to), I think I 
> can talk him into continuing the sequencer effort: he was not discussing 
> the design in the open, so he should have expected the process to be 
> dragged out.

Having a sequencer in C would make me even happier. ;)

-Peff