Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks

From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@istop.com>
Date: Apr 26, 2005, 01:49 UTC
Message-ID: <200504252149.50735.phillips@istop.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050426004111.GI21897@waste.org>

On Monday 25 April 2005 20:41, Matt Mackall wrote:

> Despite the above, it compares pretty well to git in speed and is
> quite a bit better in terms of storage space. By reducing the zlib
> compression level, it could probably win across the board.

Hi Matt,

Congratulations on an impressive demo! How about actually checking the compression vs wall clock theory? And I probably don't have to mention psyco...

Regards,

Daniel

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.