Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From
- Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Date
- Apr 27, 2005, 21:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <87r7gw3p6p.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <426FFE58.4050901@zytor.com>
* H. Peter Anvin:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Florian Weimer wrote: >> Benchmarks are actually a bit tricky because as far as I can tell, >> once you hash the directories, they are tainted even if you mount your >> file system with ext2. > > That's what fsck -D is for.
Ah, cool, I didn't know that it works the other way, too. Thanks.