Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
- From
- H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
- Date
- Apr 27, 2005, 21:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <426FFE58.4050901@zytor.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <874qds5489.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Benchmarks are actually a bit tricky because as far as I can tell, > once you hash the directories, they are tainted even if you mount your > file system with ext2.
That's what fsck -D is for.
-hpa