From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@istop.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 01:49:50 GMT
Subject: Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
Message-ID: <200504252149.50735.phillips@istop.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050426004111.GI21897@waste.org>

On Monday 25 April 2005 20:41, Matt Mackall wrote:
> Despite the above, it compares pretty well to git in speed and is
> quite a bit better in terms of storage space. By reducing the zlib
> compression level, it could probably win across the board.

Hi Matt,

Congratulations on an impressive demo!  How about actually checking the 
compression vs wall clock theory?  And I probably don't have to mention 
psyco...

Regards,

Daniel