RE: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark
- From
- Tom Lord <lord@emf.net>
- Date
- Apr 29, 2005, 20:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200504292026.NAA28131@emf.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <000e01c54cf7$f61ee4a0$9b11a8c0@allianceoneinc.com>
> It looks to me like he did read carefully.
> There were two different ideas: > TL) Passing tree & diff and trusting diff to create tree > NM) Passing tree and generating diff versus local tree for review
Well, I guess *you* didn't read carefully. I also spoke about the value of passing around triples: ancestry, diff, and tree. The question is about linking signatures to things that humans can reasonably *intend* and be reasonably held accountable for, hence one of the values of signed diffs. (I cited other practical reasons to value signed diffs and use them in specific ways, too.)
-t